Research to Action

The Global Guide to Research Impact

Navigation

  • Home

  • How To ▾

    This list of how to’s provides an essential guide for a number of key communication and engagement activities that will help make your research travel.

    • Building Capacity
    • Policy Briefs
    • Research Impact
    • Theory of Change
    • Uptake Strategy
  • Topics ▾

    • Eye on 2022
    • Impact Practitioners ▸
      • Impact Practitioners
    • Knowing your audience ▸
      • Building a strategy
      • Engaging policy audiences ▸
        • EBPDN
        • Targeting policy actors
        • Targeting practitioners
      • Stakeholder mapping
      • Strategic communication ▸
        • Building a brand
        • Engaging the public
      • Working with the media
    • Making your research accessible ▸
      • Framing challenges
      • Knowledge translation
      • Learning in context
      • Open access
      • Presenting your research
      • Using digital tools ▸
        • Using multi media
        • Using online tools/ICTs
        • Using social media
      • Using intermediaries
    • Monitoring and evaluation ▸
      • Applying M&E methods
      • Evidence into policy
      • Measuring success
    • Uncategorized
  • Dialogue Spaces ▾

    • GDN: Doing Research
    • Manchester Policy Week 2015
    • TTI Exchange 2015
    • Strengthening Institutions to Improve Public Expenditure Accountability (GDN PEM Project)
    • DFID/AusAid Research Communication and Uptake Workshop
    • 3ie Policy Influence and Monitoring (PIM) project
    • Policy Engagement and Communications (PEC) Programme
  • Reading Lists

  • Impact Practitioners

    • Impact Practitioners overview
    • Capacity Building
    • Communication and Engagement
    • Frameworks
    • Indicators
    • Learning
    • Monitoring and Evaluation
    • Policy Impact
    • Strategy
    • Theoretical
    • Utilisation

Social Media

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Vimeo

Featured

Rational decision-making? It just doesn’t work that way…

By Abdourahmane Idrissa 24/09/2009

The more I learn about the way people make decisions, the more I wish I’d studied psychology.

We’ve evolved, but not as much as we think we have. Or at least our brains are still very much running mainly on gut instinct and instant reaction. It’s a situation that has served us well in the past, but isn’t necessarily appropriate to making rational decisions from the wealth of varied choices that we often have on offer today.

Policymakers have a plethora of stakeholders out there, and a paucity of resources. They have an unenviable job, sorting the wheat from the chaff, and choosing which among all the worthwhile research proposals to fund and support.

Irrationality by psychology professor Stewart Sutherland was first published in 1992, but is still a gripping (and funny) read nearly twenty years later. It describes many experiments that prove time and time again how we are all swayed by forces beyond our control unless we actively avoid the traps. With chapters titles that include ‘Ignoring the evidence’, ‘Distorting the evidence’, and ‘Misinterpreting the evidence’, there is something to make anyone’s jaw drop in disbelief.

Even if it doesn’t provide clear instructions about how to ensure a policymaker makes the decision that you want, it certainly provides clues to why they might not. For example, Sutherland shows just how strongly we resist changing our minds about a decision once we have said it in public, a situation that politicians and policymakers get bounced into all the time.

There are good lessons for researchers too. Experiments showed how committees or meetings made up of like-minded people not only fail to properly consider evidence that is contrary to their current opinion, finding myriad ways to discount its credibility, but also emerge having taken a collective position on an issue that is stronger than the position that any of the group members hold individually. If you are forming a steering or oversight committee and want it done properly, do make sure you include people who genuinely hold a range of different opinions and views. If you are creating an interdisciplinary team to carry out a research project, do consider finding room for a pyschologist. And do read the book. You won’t regret it and you may even make better decisions yourself as a result.

Related posts

EBPDN: Refreshing recommended resources - 31/10/2019
Building momentum to advance citizen evidence in policymaking - 03/09/2019
Bringing researchers and knowledge brokers together for greater impact - 29/05/2019

Get 'New Post' e-alerts and follow R2A

> > > > >

Contribute to R2A:
We welcome blogposts, news about jobs, events or funding, and recommendations for great resources about development communications and research uptake.

Topics: communication, decision-making, Participative communication, policy, policy making, psychology, r4d, research, research communication, resources, text

Abdourahmane Idrissa

Abdourahmane Idrissa is a political scientist based in Niamey, Niger, where he founded the Think Tank EPGA in 2015. The focus of the Think Tank is to influence policy-making in issues related to youth employment, migration and population through empirical and theoretical research in Niger and West Africa. He has recently published a Historical Dictionary of Niger and L’Afrique pour les nuls (‘Africa for Dummies’).

Contribute Write a blog post, post a job or event, recommend a resource

Partner with Us Are you an institution looking to increase your impact?

Tweets by @Research2Action

Most Recent Posts

  •  How to develop input, activity, output, outcome and impact indicators 
  • Free webinar: Beyond content delivery: How to make online learning truly participatory
  • UNV Social and Behaviour Change (SBC) Officer, UNICEF: Ethiopia – Deadline 29 March
  • How research influences policy: case studies from Australia
  • Network for Advancing & Evaluating the Societal Impact of Science

This Week's Most Read

  • How to write actionable policy recommendations
  • What do we mean by ‘impact’?
  • Policymaker, policy maker, or policy-maker?
  • Outcome Mapping: A Basic Introduction
  • Gap analysis for literature reviews and advancing useful knowledge
  • 12ft Ladder: Making research accessible
  • Stakeholder Analysis: A basic introduction
  • Key questions to ask when putting together a Theory of Change for Research Uptake (Part 1 of 2)
  • Top tips: Writing newspaper opinion pieces
  • Decolonising research: Some useful strategies

About Us

Research To Action (R2A) is a learning platform for anyone interested in maximising the impact of research and capturing evidence of impact.

The site publishes practical resources on a range of topics including research uptake, communications, policy influence and monitoring and evaluation. It captures the experiences of practitioners and researchers working on these topics and facilitates conversations between this global community through a range of social media platforms.

R2A is produced by a small editorial team, led by CommsConsult. We welcome suggestions for and contributions to the site.

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Cookies
  • Contribute

Subscribe to our newsletter!

Our contributors

  • Paula Fray
  • Shubha Jayaram
  • Sue Martin
  • Maria Balarin
  • James Harvey
  • Emily Hayter
  • Susan Koshy
  • Ronald Munatsi
  • Ajoy Datta

Browse all authors

Friends and partners

  • AuthorAid
  • Global Development Network (GDN)
  • INASP
  • Institute of Development Studies (IDS)
  • International Initiative for Impact Evaluation (3ie)
  • ODI RAPID
  • On Think Tanks
  • Politics & Ideas
  • Research for Development (R4D)
  • Research Impact

Copyright © 2023 Research to Action. All rights reserved. Log in