Research to Action

The Global Guide to Research Impact

Navigation

  • Home

  • How To ▾

    This list of how to’s provides an essential guide for a number of key communication and engagement activities that will help make your research travel.

    • Building Capacity
    • Policy Briefs
    • Research Impact
    • Theory of Change
    • Uptake Strategy
  • Topics ▾

    • Knowing your audience ▸
      • Building a strategy
      • Engaging policy audiences ▸
        • EBPDN
        • Targeting policy actors
        • Targeting practitioners
      • Stakeholder mapping
      • Strategic communication ▸
        • Building a brand
        • Engaging the public
      • Working with the media
    • Making your research accessible ▸
      • Framing challenges
      • Knowledge translation
      • Learning in context
      • Open access
      • Presenting your research
      • Using digital tools ▸
        • Using multi media
        • Using online tools/ICTs
        • Using social media
      • Using intermediaries
    • Monitoring and evaluation ▸
      • Applying M&E methods
      • Evidence into policy
      • Measuring success
  • Dialogue Spaces ▾

    • GDN: Doing Research
    • Manchester Policy Week 2015
    • TTI Exchange 2015
    • Strengthening Institutions to Improve Public Expenditure Accountability (GDN PEM Project)
    • DFID/AusAid Research Communication and Uptake Workshop
    • 3ie Policy Influence and Monitoring (PIM) project
    • Policy Engagement and Communications (PEC) Programme
  • Reading Lists

  • Opportunities

Social Media

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Vimeo
  • RSS

Featured

How can we support the use of systematic reviews in policymaking?

By Research to Action 09/07/2010

Share this post:

The article, How Can We Support the Use of Systematic Reviews in Policymaking? Talks about how the landscape has changed for policy makers, why systematic reviews* are important for policy makers and how to support the use of reviews.

Summary points:

  • Policy makers need many types of systematic reviews synthesized and packaged for them, and the use of this evidence supported in multiple complementary ways.
  • Policy makers and stakeholders need many types of systematic reviews, for example reviews of qualitative studies to help understand alternative frameworks and to appreciate other perspectives.
  • Policy makers now have access to many review derived products eg summaries and overviews of systematic reviews and questions and insights to address the problem with implementation strategies.
  • A range of activities are being undertaken to support the use of reviews and review-derived products in policymaking, all of which warrant rigorous evaluation.
  • Future challenges include: (1) examining whether and when any apparent duplication of efforts occurs in the production of review-derived products at the international level; and (2) scaling up activities that are found to be effective in supporting the use of reviews and review-derived products in policymaking.
Title: Author: John Lavis Year: 2009

*A systematic review is a literature review that aims to provide a comprehensive summary of literature to a research question. It focuses on a question that is trying to identify, assess and synthesize all research evidence relevant to that question.


Share this post:

Related posts

EBPDN: Refreshing recommended resources - 31/10/2019
Building momentum to advance citizen evidence in policymaking - 03/09/2019
Bringing researchers and knowledge brokers together for greater impact - 29/05/2019

Get 'New Post' e-alerts and follow R2A

> > > > >
Share this post:

Contribute to R2A:
We welcome blogposts, news about jobs, events or funding, and recommendations for great resources about development communications and research uptake.


Share this post:

Topics: policy making, systematic reviews

Research to Action

Research to Action

Research to Action (R2A) is a website catering for the strategic and practical needs of people trying to improve the uptake of development research.

Subscribe E-alerts and RSS feeds

Contribute Write a blog post, post a job or event, recommend a resource

Partner with Us Are you an institution looking to increase your impact?

Tweets by @Research2Action

Most Recent Posts

  • How to rebuild trust in science and expertise
  • Five Broad Stages of Research
  • Advocacy Advisor, WaterAid: London or Global Offices – Deadline 15 November
  • Using social media to combat corruption
  • Communications and Impact Manager: IDS, Brighton – Deadline 3 November

This Week's Most Read

  • Policymaker, policy maker, or policy-maker?
  • What do we mean by ‘impact’?
  • How to write actionable policy recommendations
  • Gap analysis for literature reviews and advancing useful knowledge
  • Outcome Mapping: A Basic Introduction
  • How does policy change happen?
  • Top tips: Writing newspaper opinion pieces
  • Key questions to ask when putting together a Theory of Change for Research Uptake (Part 1 of 2)
  • Three ways that knowledge brokers can strengthen the impact of scientific research
  • Synthetic literature reviews: An introduction

About Us

Research to Action (R2A) is a website catering for the strategic and practical needs of people trying to improve the uptake of development research, in particular those funded by DFID.

We have structured the site and populated it with material that we think will be immediately useful to this audience, but also to development researchers in general who would like to be more strategic and effective in their communications.

R2A is produced by a small editorial team, led by CommsConsult. We welcome suggestions for and contributions to the site.

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Cookies
  • Contribute

Our contributors

  • Paula FrayPaula Fray
  • Shubha JayaramShubha Jayaram
  • AvatarSue Martin
  • Maria BalarinMaria Balarin
  • James HarveyJames Harvey
  • Emily HayterEmily Hayter
  • Susan KoshySusan Koshy
  • Ronald MunatsiRonald Munatsi
  • Ajoy DattaAjoy Datta

Browse all authors

Friends and partners

  • AuthorAid
  • Global Development Network (GDN)
  • INASP
  • Institute of Development Studies (IDS)
  • International Initiative for Impact Evaluation (3ie)
  • ODI RAPID
  • On Think Tanks
  • Politics & Ideas
  • Research for Development (R4D)
  • Research Impact

Copyright © 2021 Research to Action. All rights reserved. Log in

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Read MoreCookie settingsACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are as essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled

Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.

Non-necessary

Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.