Research to Action

The Global Guide to Research Impact

Navigation

  • Home

  • How To ▾

    This list of how to’s provides an essential guide for a number of key communication and engagement activities that will help make your research travel.

    • Building Capacity
    • Policy Briefs
    • Research Impact
    • Theory of Change
    • Uptake Strategy
  • Topics ▾

    • AEN Evidence 23
    • Eye on 2022
    • Impact Practitioners
    • Knowing your audience ▸
      • Building a strategy
      • Engaging policy audiences ▸
        • EBPDN
        • Targeting policy actors
        • Targeting practitioners
      • Stakeholder mapping
      • Strategic communication ▸
        • Building a brand
        • Engaging the public
      • Working with the media
    • Making your research accessible ▸
      • Framing challenges
      • Knowledge translation
      • Learning in context
      • Open access
      • Presenting your research
      • Using digital tools ▸
        • Using multi media
        • Using online tools/ICTs
        • Using social media
      • Using intermediaries
    • Monitoring and evaluation ▸
      • Applying M&E methods
      • Evidence into policy
      • Measuring success
    • Uncategorized
  • Dialogue Spaces ▾

    • Youth Inclusion and Engagement Space
    • AEN Evidence
    • GDN: Doing Research
    • Manchester Policy Week 2015
    • TTI Exchange 2015
    • Strengthening Institutions to Improve Public Expenditure Accountability (GDN PEM Project)
    • DFID/AusAid Research Communication and Uptake Workshop
    • 3ie Policy Influence and Monitoring (PIM) project
    • Policy Engagement and Communications (PEC) Programme
  • Reading Lists

  • Impact Practitioners

    • Impact Practitioners overview
    • Capacity Building
    • Communication and Engagement
    • Frameworks
    • Indicators
    • Learning
    • Monitoring and Evaluation
    • Policy Impact
    • Strategy
    • Theoretical
    • Utilisation

Social Media

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Vimeo

Featured

E-journals: their use, value and impact

By Research to Action 20/12/2010

A report by the Research Information Network (RIN) has explored how researchers in the UK use electronic journals, the value they bring to universities and research institutions, and the contribution they make to research productivity.

The report produced the following key findings:

1. E-journals are a big deal

• UK research institutions rely on e-journals. Over four months, users at ten UK research institutions visited nearly 1,400 ScienceDirect journals half a million times. In one year, users at the same ten institutions visited 61 Oxford Journals online publications a quarter of a million times.

2. Information seeking is fast and direct

• Many users look for publications using search engines such as Google and Google Scholar, or gateway sites such as PubMed. They then stay on the journal site for just long enough to pick up the full article that they have already identified.

• Most users visit ScienceDirect for only a few minutes and view no more than a couple of pages.

• Once users enter a journal site they tend to browse rather than use the site’s own search facility. Advanced search functions are rarely used at all.

• 24-hour access to e-journals is important to researchers. Almost a quarter of ScienceDirect use occurs outside the traditional 9-5 working day, while weekends account for around 15 per cent of use.

3. Researchers use e-journals in different ways

• Users in research-intensive universities show the highest use of e-journals and spend the least amount of time on each visit – they’re most likely to have already identified the information they need on a gateway site.

• How researchers use e-journal sites also varies according to subject area. Historians search for and use e-journals in very different ways from scientists. Compared, for example, with life scientists, historians are more likely to access e-journals via Google and to use menus and search facilities once they’re on the journal website.

4. Higher spending on e-journals is linked to more use and better research outcomes

• Universities and colleges spent £79.8 million on licenses for e-journals in 2006/07. Researchers and students in higher education downloaded 102 million full-text articles in that year, at an average cost of £0.80 per download.

• There is a strong positive correlation between universities’ expenditure on e-journals and number of articles downloaded.

• There is a clear correlation between levels of use of e-journals and research outcomes, with more usage linked to the number of papers published, number of PhD awards and income from research grants and contracts. This link is independent of institution size.

Source: E-journals: their use, value and impact, Research Information Network Briefing, April 2009

E-journals: their use, value and impact, Research Information  Network, April 2009

E-journals: their use, value and impact, Research Information Network Briefing

More information on this research can be found through the following link: E-journals: their use, value and impact

Related posts

What role for research when ordinary life is put on hold? - 29/11/2024
Africa’s use of evidence: challenges and opportunities - 02/09/2024
Nothing about us without us - 23/08/2024

Get 'New Post' e-alerts and follow R2A

> > > > >

Contribute to R2A:
We welcome blogposts, news about jobs, events or funding, and recommendations for great resources about development communications and research uptake.

Topics: e-journals, electronic journals, google scholar, research impact, research information network, research tools, RIN,, sciencedirect, uk, universities, web based tools

Research to Action

Research to Action (R2A) is a website catering for the strategic and practical needs of people trying to improve the uptake of development research.

Contribute Write a blog post, post a job or event, recommend a resource

Partner with Us Are you an institution looking to increase your impact?

Most Recent Posts

  • What international crisis coverage reveals about the aid system
  • The Future of Evidence: UNICEF’s Blueprint for Smarter Research
  • Why research users are central to research impact
  • Whose knowledge counts in development research?
  • How can research support volunteering?
What does it mean to do research in “difficult places”? 🌍

Jon Harle’s blog series looks at South Sudan, Liberia, and the Somali regions—exploring both the challenges and the possibilities of using evidence in fragile contexts.

Follow the link in our bio to read all three articles 🔗

#ResearchMatters #EvidenceForImpact #GlobalDevelopment #FragileStates #KnowledgeInCrisis #ResearchInDifficultPlaces

What does it mean to do research in “difficult places”? 🌍

Jon Harle’s blog series looks at South Sudan, Liberia, and the Somali regions—exploring both the challenges and the possibilities of using evidence in fragile contexts.

Follow the link in our bio to read all three articles 🔗

#ResearchMatters #EvidenceForImpact #GlobalDevelopment #FragileStates #KnowledgeInCrisis #ResearchInDifficultPlaces

Looking back at the #R2AArchive this week...

We have landed upon this 2013 piece by Jorge Benavides on what it really takes to turn research into policy.

Based on his work in Guatemala, Benavides shares 5 key lessons for influencing change:
👉 Politics matters – research alone won’t cut it.
👉 Timing is everything – wait for the right window.
👉 Choose allies wisely – coalitions amplify your impact.
👉 Play the long game – real change takes time.
👉 Frame it smartly – make it a win–win.

His takeaway? Evidence is essential—but without artful engagement, it won’t move the needle.

🔗 Read more: https://ow.ly/tfxp50WAE1s (or via #R2AArchive link on Linktree) 🔗

#PolicyChange #ResearchToAction #EvidenceMatters #PolicyInfluence

Looking back at the #R2AArchive this week...

We have landed upon this 2013 piece by Jorge Benavides on what it really takes to turn research into policy.

Based on his work in Guatemala, Benavides shares 5 key lessons for influencing change:
👉 Politics matters – research alone won’t cut it.
👉 Timing is everything – wait for the right window.
👉 Choose allies wisely – coalitions amplify your impact.
👉 Play the long game – real change takes time.
👉 Frame it smartly – make it a win–win.

His takeaway? Evidence is essential—but without artful engagement, it won’t move the needle.

🔗 Read more: https://ow.ly/tfxp50WAE1s (or via #R2AArchive link on Linktree) 🔗

#PolicyChange #ResearchToAction #EvidenceMatters #PolicyInfluence

🗞️ How we tell stories matters.
Our latest blog reflects on Patrick Gathara’s critique of humanitarian storytelling—and how media narratives can uphold the very power structures aid aims to dismantle.

🔍 Big questions:
🧩 Should journalists rethink the stories they tell about crisis?
🧩 Can media and humanitarians work together ethically?

A thoughtful read for anyone passionate about:
🌍 Decolonising aid
📰 Ethical journalism
📣 Amplifying local voices

🔗 Link in bio to read the full blog!
#DecoloniseAid #MediaEthics #HumanitarianNarratives #TheNewHumanitarian #StorytellingMatters #ResearchToAction

🗞️ How we tell stories matters.
Our latest blog reflects on Patrick Gathara’s critique of humanitarian storytelling—and how media narratives can uphold the very power structures aid aims to dismantle.

🔍 Big questions:
🧩 Should journalists rethink the stories they tell about crisis?
🧩 Can media and humanitarians work together ethically?

A thoughtful read for anyone passionate about:
🌍 Decolonising aid
📰 Ethical journalism
📣 Amplifying local voices

🔗 Link in bio to read the full blog!
#DecoloniseAid #MediaEthics #HumanitarianNarratives #TheNewHumanitarian #StorytellingMatters #ResearchToAction


About Us

Research To Action (R2A) is a learning platform for anyone interested in maximising the impact of research and capturing evidence of impact.

The site publishes practical resources on a range of topics including research uptake, communications, policy influence and monitoring and evaluation. It captures the experiences of practitioners and researchers working on these topics and facilitates conversations between this global community through a range of social media platforms.

R2A is produced by a small editorial team, led by CommsConsult. We welcome suggestions for and contributions to the site.

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Cookies
  • Contribute

Subscribe to our newsletter!

Our contributors

  • Paula Fray
  • Shubha Jayaram
  • Sue Martin
  • Maria Balarin
  • James Harvey
  • Emily Hayter
  • Susan Koshy
  • Ronald Munatsi
  • Ajoy Datta

Browse all authors

Friends and partners

  • AuthorAid
  • Global Development Network (GDN)
  • INASP
  • Institute of Development Studies (IDS)
  • International Initiative for Impact Evaluation (3ie)
  • ODI RAPID
  • On Think Tanks
  • Politics & Ideas
  • Research for Development (R4D)
  • Research Impact

Copyright © 2025 Research to Action. All rights reserved. Log in