Research to Action

The Global Guide to Research Impact

Navigation

  • Home

  • How To ▾

    This list of how to’s provides an essential guide for a number of key communication and engagement activities that will help make your research travel.

    • Building Capacity
    • Policy Briefs
    • Research Impact
    • Theory of Change
    • Uptake Strategy
  • Topics ▾

    • Eye on 2022
    • Knowing your audience ▸
      • Building a strategy
      • Engaging policy audiences ▸
        • EBPDN
        • Targeting policy actors
        • Targeting practitioners
      • Stakeholder mapping
      • Strategic communication ▸
        • Building a brand
        • Engaging the public
      • Working with the media
    • Making your research accessible ▸
      • Framing challenges
      • Knowledge translation
      • Learning in context
      • Open access
      • Presenting your research
      • Using digital tools ▸
        • Using multi media
        • Using online tools/ICTs
        • Using social media
      • Using intermediaries
    • Monitoring and evaluation ▸
      • Applying M&E methods
      • Evidence into policy
      • Measuring success
    • Uncategorized
  • Dialogue Spaces ▾

    • GDN: Doing Research
    • Manchester Policy Week 2015
    • TTI Exchange 2015
    • Strengthening Institutions to Improve Public Expenditure Accountability (GDN PEM Project)
    • DFID/AusAid Research Communication and Uptake Workshop
    • 3ie Policy Influence and Monitoring (PIM) project
    • Policy Engagement and Communications (PEC) Programme
  • Reading Lists

  • Opportunities

Social Media

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Vimeo
  • RSS

Featured

E-journals: their use, value and impact

By Research to Action 20/12/2010

A report by the Research Information Network (RIN) has explored how researchers in the UK use electronic journals, the value they bring to universities and research institutions, and the contribution they make to research productivity.

The report produced the following key findings:

1. E-journals are a big deal

• UK research institutions rely on e-journals. Over four months, users at ten UK research institutions visited nearly 1,400 ScienceDirect journals half a million times. In one year, users at the same ten institutions visited 61 Oxford Journals online publications a quarter of a million times.

2. Information seeking is fast and direct

• Many users look for publications using search engines such as Google and Google Scholar, or gateway sites such as PubMed. They then stay on the journal site for just long enough to pick up the full article that they have already identified.

• Most users visit ScienceDirect for only a few minutes and view no more than a couple of pages.

• Once users enter a journal site they tend to browse rather than use the site’s own search facility. Advanced search functions are rarely used at all.

• 24-hour access to e-journals is important to researchers. Almost a quarter of ScienceDirect use occurs outside the traditional 9-5 working day, while weekends account for around 15 per cent of use.

3. Researchers use e-journals in different ways

• Users in research-intensive universities show the highest use of e-journals and spend the least amount of time on each visit – they’re most likely to have already identified the information they need on a gateway site.

• How researchers use e-journal sites also varies according to subject area. Historians search for and use e-journals in very different ways from scientists. Compared, for example, with life scientists, historians are more likely to access e-journals via Google and to use menus and search facilities once they’re on the journal website.

4. Higher spending on e-journals is linked to more use and better research outcomes

• Universities and colleges spent £79.8 million on licenses for e-journals in 2006/07. Researchers and students in higher education downloaded 102 million full-text articles in that year, at an average cost of £0.80 per download.

• There is a strong positive correlation between universities’ expenditure on e-journals and number of articles downloaded.

• There is a clear correlation between levels of use of e-journals and research outcomes, with more usage linked to the number of papers published, number of PhD awards and income from research grants and contracts. This link is independent of institution size.

Source: E-journals: their use, value and impact, Research Information Network Briefing, April 2009

E-journals: their use, value and impact, Research Information  Network, April 2009

E-journals: their use, value and impact, Research Information Network Briefing

More information on this research can be found through the following link: E-journals: their use, value and impact

Related posts

EBPDN: Refreshing recommended resources - 31/10/2019
Building momentum to advance citizen evidence in policymaking - 03/09/2019
Bringing researchers and knowledge brokers together for greater impact - 29/05/2019

Get 'New Post' e-alerts and follow R2A

> > > > >

Contribute to R2A:
We welcome blogposts, news about jobs, events or funding, and recommendations for great resources about development communications and research uptake.

Topics: e-journals, electronic journals, google scholar, research impact, research information network, research tools, RIN,, sciencedirect, uk, universities, web based tools

Research to Action

Research to Action (R2A) is a website catering for the strategic and practical needs of people trying to improve the uptake of development research.

Subscribe E-alerts and RSS feeds

Contribute Write a blog post, post a job or event, recommend a resource

Partner with Us Are you an institution looking to increase your impact?

Tweets by @Research2Action

Most Recent Posts

  • Funding opportunity – Research partnerships with indigenous researchers: Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC) – Deadline 9 August
  • How the COVID-19 pandemic has affected Africa
  • Project Officer (bilingual Ukrainian/English), Street Child: Remote working – preferably based in Ukraine or neighbouring country – Deadline 8th July
  • Innovative solutions to the climate change crisis
  • Pre-announcement: international networks for disability-inclusive global development, Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC) – Deadline 22 September

This Week's Most Read

  • Policymaker, policy maker, or policy-maker?
  • How to write actionable policy recommendations
  • What do we mean by ‘impact’?
  • Gap analysis for literature reviews and advancing useful knowledge
  • Outcome Mapping: A Basic Introduction
  • Key questions to ask when putting together a Theory of Change for Research Uptake (Part 1 of 2)
  • Social Network Analysis: A basic introduction
  • The use and abuse of research evidence
  • Top tips: Writing newspaper opinion pieces
  • How researchers use LinkedIn effectively

About Us

Research to Action (R2A) is a website catering for the strategic and practical needs of people trying to improve the uptake of development research, in particular those funded by DFID.

We have structured the site and populated it with material that we think will be immediately useful to this audience, but also to development researchers in general who would like to be more strategic and effective in their communications.

R2A is produced by a small editorial team, led by CommsConsult. We welcome suggestions for and contributions to the site.

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Cookies
  • Contribute

Our contributors

  • Paula Fray
  • Shubha Jayaram
  • Sue Martin
  • Maria Balarin
  • James Harvey
  • Emily Hayter
  • Susan Koshy
  • Ronald Munatsi
  • Ajoy Datta

Browse all authors

Friends and partners

  • AuthorAid
  • Global Development Network (GDN)
  • INASP
  • Institute of Development Studies (IDS)
  • International Initiative for Impact Evaluation (3ie)
  • ODI RAPID
  • On Think Tanks
  • Politics & Ideas
  • Research for Development (R4D)
  • Research Impact

Copyright © 2022 Research to Action. All rights reserved. Log in