Research to Action

The Global Guide to Research Impact

Navigation

  • Home

  • How To ▾

    This list of how to’s provides an essential guide for a number of key communication and engagement activities that will help make your research travel.

    • Building Capacity
    • Policy Briefs
    • Research Impact
    • Theory of Change
    • Uptake Strategy
  • Topics ▾

    • Eye on 2022
    • Impact Practitioners ▸
      • Impact Practitioners
    • Knowing your audience ▸
      • Building a strategy
      • Engaging policy audiences ▸
        • EBPDN
        • Targeting policy actors
        • Targeting practitioners
      • Stakeholder mapping
      • Strategic communication ▸
        • Building a brand
        • Engaging the public
      • Working with the media
    • Making your research accessible ▸
      • Framing challenges
      • Knowledge translation
      • Learning in context
      • Open access
      • Presenting your research
      • Using digital tools ▸
        • Using multi media
        • Using online tools/ICTs
        • Using social media
      • Using intermediaries
    • Monitoring and evaluation ▸
      • Applying M&E methods
      • Evidence into policy
      • Measuring success
    • Uncategorized
  • Dialogue Spaces ▾

    • GDN: Doing Research
    • Manchester Policy Week 2015
    • TTI Exchange 2015
    • Strengthening Institutions to Improve Public Expenditure Accountability (GDN PEM Project)
    • DFID/AusAid Research Communication and Uptake Workshop
    • 3ie Policy Influence and Monitoring (PIM) project
    • Policy Engagement and Communications (PEC) Programme
  • Reading Lists

  • Impact Practitioners

    • Impact Practitioners overview
    • Capacity Building
    • Communication and Engagement
    • Frameworks
    • Indicators
    • Learning
    • Monitoring and Evaluation
    • Policy Impact
    • Strategy
    • Theoretical
    • Utilisation

Social Media

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Vimeo

Featured

GDN/PEM Asia Research Communications Workshop

By Zeinab Sabet 17/10/2011

Being influential requires you to be clear who you are trying to influence! As basic as this sounds, it is often the reason why researchers fail to make a bigger impact with their work.

GDNet’s ongoing research communications capacity building workshops explored some of the tools to help researchers analyse and target stakeholders recently. The two-day workshop, organized by GDNet and delivered in partnership with CommsConsult,  took place on October 10-11, 2011 in Delhi.

The workshop was specifically designed for a group of Asian researchers involved in the GDN PEM Project (Strengthening Institutions to Improve Public Expenditure Accountability to influence policy decisions with their research results in their respective countries. The workshop gathered 12 participants from the following countries: Armenia; Nepal; Philippines; India; Indonesia and Bangladesh.

A special session was dedicated to present and practice the Alignment, Interest and Influence Matrix (AIIM) tool. While the RAPID Outcome Mapping Approach (ROMA) had used a standard stakeholder Analysis tool to identify the audiences of research-based and policy influencing interventions, the AIIM was designed to be used in a workshop setting not only to help identifying the main stakeholders, but also suggest a possible course of action towards them.

Participants were divided into groups and were given instructions on how to apply the AIIM, on a case of their choice, in order to clarify where some of the interventions’ main policy audiences and targets stand in relation to the objectives of their research, as well as possible influencing approaches and tactics.

The following research theme was chosen by one of the groups: increasing the enrolment in primary schools through providing free meals to children. As shown in the picture below, researchers identified the actors that are likely to influence the policy and mapped them onto the matrix according to their level of alignment and interest.

The mapping exercise is very effective because it makes people think about all of the different institutions and organisaitons that could have a role to play in bringing about change. So, our group started with the obvious stakeholders – government departments, school officers etc. – and only then realized that parents, tax payers and donors all have influence over these decisions. As soon as an actor has been placed on the matrix, someone questions why they are placed in that quadrant: then comes the analysis about how powerful and how interested each one is, in support or against the research policy goals. Once the mapping is completed, only then can we prioritize and identify the most influential actors on the policy process. For many researchers, this is the first time that they have thought through a stakeholder analysis – and they found it invaluable. A cursory review of the evaluations from the workshop shows this to be the most useful part of the two days.

The workshop aimed primarily at increasing the understanding of how research influences and informs policy. A special Policy Panel was established to provide researchers with an understanding of the evidence needs of different kinds of policymaker. Participants were given the opportunity to look at the media landscape in Asia, how research can make news and what would make PEM research newsworthy through a Media Panel that assembled journalists from different agencies and backgrounds. One of the objectives of the workshop was to create confidence about when and how to communicate in order to maximize the research’s impact, and presenting research in public forums. Special synergies were organized to build the researchers’ skills on writing policy briefs and producing materials for the media, particularly press releases.

To sum up, the workshop gave the participants the opportunity to learn how to identify their audiences and how to tailor their key messages accordingly, to develop strategies for engaging policy audiences as well as to agree on principles for effective communication.

During the workshop, we recorded interviews with some participants to learn more about their research and to understand how they benefited from this GDNet capacity building event. Interviews are to follow soon on our blog.

This post originally appeared on the GDNet blog.

Related posts

EBPDN: Refreshing recommended resources - 31/10/2019
Building momentum to advance citizen evidence in policymaking - 03/09/2019
Bringing researchers and knowledge brokers together for greater impact - 29/05/2019

Get 'New Post' e-alerts and follow R2A

> > > > >

Contribute to R2A:
We welcome blogposts, news about jobs, events or funding, and recommendations for great resources about development communications and research uptake.

Topics: alignment interest and influence matrix, gdn, gdnet, global development network, odi, pem, policy making, policy process, public expenditure, rapid, research communications workshop, text, workshop, zeinab sabet

Zeinab Sabet

Zeinab Sabet (Research Communication Capacity Building Manager, GDNet) has worked for Amnesty International (EU Office) and the United United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). She holds a Master degree in Political and Social Sciences from "Institut d’Etudes Politiques de Strasbourg" and another in EU International Relations and Diplomacy Studies from the College of Europe.

Contribute Write a blog post, post a job or event, recommend a resource

Partner with Us Are you an institution looking to increase your impact?

Tweets by @Research2Action

Most Recent Posts

  • Designing research uptake strategy: four areas to consider
  • Join the AEN Podcast Party!
  • Senior Associate – Communications and Engagement: Healthy Brains Global Initiative – Deadline 2nd June
  • Evaluating impact from research
  • Powered by Evidence podcast by GEI

This Week's Most Read

  • What do we mean by ‘impact’?
  • 12ft Ladder: Making research accessible
  • How to write actionable policy recommendations
  • Policymaker, policy maker, or policy-maker?
  • Gap analysis for literature reviews and advancing useful knowledge
  • Stakeholder Engagement a Tool to Measure Public Policy
  • Outcome Mapping: A Basic Introduction
  •  How to develop input, activity, output, outcome and impact indicators 
  • Synthetic literature reviews: An introduction
  • Top tips: Writing newspaper opinion pieces

About Us

Research To Action (R2A) is a learning platform for anyone interested in maximising the impact of research and capturing evidence of impact.

The site publishes practical resources on a range of topics including research uptake, communications, policy influence and monitoring and evaluation. It captures the experiences of practitioners and researchers working on these topics and facilitates conversations between this global community through a range of social media platforms.

R2A is produced by a small editorial team, led by CommsConsult. We welcome suggestions for and contributions to the site.

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Cookies
  • Contribute

Subscribe to our newsletter!

Our contributors

  • Paula Fray
  • Shubha Jayaram
  • Sue Martin
  • Maria Balarin
  • James Harvey
  • Emily Hayter
  • Susan Koshy
  • Ronald Munatsi
  • Ajoy Datta

Browse all authors

Friends and partners

  • AuthorAid
  • Global Development Network (GDN)
  • INASP
  • Institute of Development Studies (IDS)
  • International Initiative for Impact Evaluation (3ie)
  • ODI RAPID
  • On Think Tanks
  • Politics & Ideas
  • Research for Development (R4D)
  • Research Impact

Copyright © 2023 Research to Action. All rights reserved. Log in