Research to Action

The Global Guide to Research Impact

Navigation

  • Home

  • How To ▾

    This list of how to’s provides an essential guide for a number of key communication and engagement activities that will help make your research travel.

    • Building Capacity
    • Policy Briefs
    • Research Impact
    • Theory of Change
    • Uptake Strategy
  • Topics ▾

    • Eye on 2022
    • Impact Practitioners ▸
      • Impact Practitioners
    • Knowing your audience ▸
      • Building a strategy
      • Engaging policy audiences ▸
        • EBPDN
        • Targeting policy actors
        • Targeting practitioners
      • Stakeholder mapping
      • Strategic communication ▸
        • Building a brand
        • Engaging the public
      • Working with the media
    • Making your research accessible ▸
      • Framing challenges
      • Knowledge translation
      • Learning in context
      • Open access
      • Presenting your research
      • Using digital tools ▸
        • Using multi media
        • Using online tools/ICTs
        • Using social media
      • Using intermediaries
    • Monitoring and evaluation ▸
      • Applying M&E methods
      • Evidence into policy
      • Measuring success
    • Uncategorized
  • Dialogue Spaces ▾

    • GDN: Doing Research
    • Manchester Policy Week 2015
    • TTI Exchange 2015
    • Strengthening Institutions to Improve Public Expenditure Accountability (GDN PEM Project)
    • DFID/AusAid Research Communication and Uptake Workshop
    • 3ie Policy Influence and Monitoring (PIM) project
    • Policy Engagement and Communications (PEC) Programme
  • Reading Lists

  • Impact Practitioners

    • Impact Practitioners overview
    • Capacity Building
    • Communication and Engagement
    • Frameworks
    • Indicators
    • Learning
    • Monitoring and Evaluation
    • Policy Impact
    • Strategy
    • Theoretical
    • Utilisation

Social Media

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Vimeo

Featured

Engaging the media for policy research: Four critical questions to consider

By Paula Fray 26/03/2014

It is a common refrain among all: “The media don’t care about research.” This is both a problem statement and a statement of the problem.

If we see the media as a homogenous mass, it is not surprising that our one-size-fits-all approach bears little fruit. Secondly, if we assume interest in our research simply because it is important, then we will not spend time and effort to make sense of research for our target audience.

It is true that powerful, earth-shattering research needs to be presented as simply as possible for a storyteller or reporter. But more nuanced, issue-based research reports, with incremental changes and contributions to ongoing debates, also need to be packaged and delivered in accessible and strategic ways. This can happen by asking four critical questions:

  • Who is the target audience?
  • Where do they usually get their information?
  • What information is needed that is either interesting or important?
  • How do they want to engage with and act upon that information?

Who is the target audience?

The media we target to disseminate research is simply a channel to reach the target audience. We therefore need to consider who that audience is and how they read, listen and speak. Through identifying these key communication elements, we can then craft a message that reaches them powerfully, evades skepticism, and increases coverage across many sources. A clear understanding of who needs to hear the message allows us to be more targeted in our approach – which greatly increases our changes of successful coverage. It allows us to identify the media which reaches the target audience most effectively, craft a message that considers their interests and concerns and provide supporting documentation for skepticism.

Where do these target audiences usually get their information?

Research reaches out to a wide range of potential audiences. We might want to inform research participants of progress in research, promote the findings to other academics, advocate by reaching out to policy makers, politicians and government officials, solicit support from funders, or raise awareness of the general public.

Media platforms, particularly print, radio, television and online, are used by audience groups for various needs and purposes connected to ease of accessibility, value and fit. Therefore, each platform approaches storytelling differently and may play a role in determining how to tell stories.

  • Print Media: Print media is positioned as a main influencer in framing news given its increasing role in setting the agenda for what is discussed on other media such as radio and television. As print media gets picked up by other media platforms, it reaches an audience that is not only literate but one that can also afford subscription fees. While this fee structure may seem limiting, print media’s long-shelf life and ability to capture complexity, context and detail still makes it a desirable media.
  • Radio and Television: While radio is a free platform, apart from its initial cost of purchase, it is increasingly becoming a background activity. We listen to the radio while we complete other tasks including driving or cleaning. And if we miss the broadcast, we miss the information. But radio is accessible, interactive and engages large numbers of people in simultaneous conversation. Through television, on the other hand, we do not just hear a story but can also visualize it. This makes television a more powerful medium preferred by many.
  • Online: Access to electricity has broadened access to television and the internet. The internet provides a direct and much faster route to news. Social media particularly allows for relationships with existing audiences to be more interactive and direct while also building relationships with new audiences.

What information is needed across these media channels? What would they define as interesting or important?

Let’s consider at the start, the definition of news. The Collins Concise Dictionary defines news as: “Important or interesting recent happenings; information about such events as in the mass media; interesting or important information not previously known.”

Few research-specific stories have universal appeal and these are generally event-based. For example, the release of research results with significant findings, a contradictory finding, or controversial view. Most of the time, however, research is issue-based and the new information is difficult to find. “Interesting or important information not previously known…” is often in the eye of the beholder. Research takes long to appear in the public domain and therefore runs the risk of becoming old news.

Moreover, a long detailed analysis will work well on print media but not on radio or social media. The question which then emerges is when do we need detail, graphics, photographs, audio, or video? In answering this, consider the differences between what each of these channels and research emphasizes in terms of people, controversy, facts, questions, solutions, and supporting documentation as well as the available space and pace of timing they each operate.

It is no longer sufficient to simply produce research. We need to package and deliver research so that the target audience – the journalists and ultimately their readers, viewers and listeners – care enough about the information to repurpose it in useful ways.

____________________________________________________________________________________________

This blog post has been produced as part of the Think Tank Initiative’s Policy Engagement and Communications (PEC) programme. However,  these are the author’s personal opinions and do not necessarily reflect those of TTI. You can find all ongoing outputs related to this project via the PEC mini-site on Research to Action. To get updates from the PEC programme and be part of the discussion sign-up to our RSS or email updates. You can also follow our progress via Twitter using the following hashtag #ttipec

Image courtsey of “Newspapers B&W (5)” by Jon S

Related posts

EBPDN: Refreshing recommended resources - 31/10/2019
Building momentum to advance citizen evidence in policymaking - 03/09/2019
Bringing researchers and knowledge brokers together for greater impact - 29/05/2019

Get 'New Post' e-alerts and follow R2A

> > > > >

Contribute to R2A:
We welcome blogposts, news about jobs, events or funding, and recommendations for great resources about development communications and research uptake.

Topics: #ttipec, CIVICUS, inter press service network, mass media, media, research communication, SADC, think tank initiative, working with journalists, working with the media

Paula Fray

Paula Fray is an award winning journalist who has gathered expertise over the last 20 years in media, advocacy and strategic communication. Paula has held senior positions at Inter Press Services (IPS) and The Star newspaper (South Africa). Drawing on these experiences she now works as a consultant with organizations like Health-e, the World Alliance for Citizen Participation (CIVICUS) and the Southern African Development Community (SADC).

Contribute Write a blog post, post a job or event, recommend a resource

Partner with Us Are you an institution looking to increase your impact?

Tweets by @Research2Action

Most Recent Posts

  • Visual storytelling: The Pudding
  • Study In Germany: 2023 Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung (FES) Scholarship Programme for Developing Countries
  •  How to develop input, activity, output, outcome and impact indicators 
  • Free webinar: Beyond content delivery: How to make online learning truly participatory
  • UNV Social and Behaviour Change (SBC) Officer, UNICEF: Ethiopia – Deadline 29 March

This Week's Most Read

  • How to write actionable policy recommendations
  • Policymaker, policy maker, or policy-maker?
  • What do we mean by ‘impact’?
  • Gap analysis for literature reviews and advancing useful knowledge
  • Outcome Mapping: A Basic Introduction
  • Top tips: Writing newspaper opinion pieces
  • 12ft Ladder: Making research accessible
  •  How to develop input, activity, output, outcome and impact indicators 
  • Stakeholder Analysis: A basic introduction
  • Stakeholder Engagement a Tool to Measure Public Policy

About Us

Research To Action (R2A) is a learning platform for anyone interested in maximising the impact of research and capturing evidence of impact.

The site publishes practical resources on a range of topics including research uptake, communications, policy influence and monitoring and evaluation. It captures the experiences of practitioners and researchers working on these topics and facilitates conversations between this global community through a range of social media platforms.

R2A is produced by a small editorial team, led by CommsConsult. We welcome suggestions for and contributions to the site.

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Cookies
  • Contribute

Subscribe to our newsletter!

Our contributors

  • Paula Fray
  • Shubha Jayaram
  • Sue Martin
  • Maria Balarin
  • James Harvey
  • Emily Hayter
  • Susan Koshy
  • Ronald Munatsi
  • Ajoy Datta

Browse all authors

Friends and partners

  • AuthorAid
  • Global Development Network (GDN)
  • INASP
  • Institute of Development Studies (IDS)
  • International Initiative for Impact Evaluation (3ie)
  • ODI RAPID
  • On Think Tanks
  • Politics & Ideas
  • Research for Development (R4D)
  • Research Impact

Copyright © 2023 Research to Action. All rights reserved. Log in