Research to Action

The Global Guide to Research Impact

Navigation

  • Home

  • How To ▾

    This list of how to’s provides an essential guide for a number of key communication and engagement activities that will help make your research travel.

    • Building Capacity
    • Policy Briefs
    • Research Impact
    • Theory of Change
    • Uptake Strategy
  • Topics ▾

    • Eye on 2022
    • Knowing your audience ▸
      • Building a strategy
      • Engaging policy audiences ▸
        • EBPDN
        • Targeting policy actors
        • Targeting practitioners
      • Stakeholder mapping
      • Strategic communication ▸
        • Building a brand
        • Engaging the public
      • Working with the media
    • Making your research accessible ▸
      • Framing challenges
      • Knowledge translation
      • Learning in context
      • Open access
      • Presenting your research
      • Using digital tools ▸
        • Using multi media
        • Using online tools/ICTs
        • Using social media
      • Using intermediaries
    • Monitoring and evaluation ▸
      • Applying M&E methods
      • Evidence into policy
      • Measuring success
    • Uncategorized
  • Dialogue Spaces ▾

    • GDN: Doing Research
    • Manchester Policy Week 2015
    • TTI Exchange 2015
    • Strengthening Institutions to Improve Public Expenditure Accountability (GDN PEM Project)
    • DFID/AusAid Research Communication and Uptake Workshop
    • 3ie Policy Influence and Monitoring (PIM) project
    • Policy Engagement and Communications (PEC) Programme
  • Reading Lists

  • Opportunities

Social Media

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Vimeo
  • RSS

Featured

Strategic communications for think tanks: Reflections from a webinar series

By Vanesa Weyrauch 12/05/2014

I have been engaged in virtual training in the research and policy field for a while but had never explored webinars before. Most of my experience is related to online courses held under the Spaces for Engagement Programme conducted by CIPPEC with the support of GDNet. We have found many advantages and opportunities in this type of courses as shared here.

Within the Policy and Engagement Programme, developed under the Think Tank Initiative, I was offered to conduct two webinars on strategic communications for think tanks in Latin America. These turned into a good opportunity to create a common space where facilitators and organisations they are working with in an independent way could come together to reflect and discuss on how we can become more strategic in communicating research, with a special emphasis on the policy environment.

Investing in strategic communications

Strategic communications is a common thread that may engage think tanks that are conducting diverse practical activities to improve communications within their institutions, ranging from stakeholders mapping to enhancing how they use social media. If strategy is not worked on properly and with a thoroughly thought process, it may turn out that you are having tangible success with a tool (i.e. new Tweeter followers) but that may not really contribute to the way you desire to contribute to policy change.

Therefore, our main goals for the webinars were to generate awareness and raise interest in strategically investing in communications to enlarge potential for research to influence public policies. To this purpose we held two seminars (two editions of each so that those who could not make it on the first date would not miss the opportunity to participate): the first was “Communicating within and for public policies” (this entailed a more conceptual reflection on de-centering attention from research when communicating and deeply focusing on the policy environment and its conversations) and the second was “Re-visiting our communications strategy” (we delved into more practical aspects of crafting and fine-tuning a strategy such as how to incorporate complexity or to promote more innovation)

Creating spaces for engagement and learning

One of the main lessons is that it is important to try to connect the different webinars, not only from the thematic standpoint but mainly to better detect interest and needs, and also to build on what emerges from participants. In that sense, in the second webinar we decided to open a larger space for horizontal exchange. In fact, for the first webinar we invited researchers from CIPPEC, a think tank that does not belong to TTI, to share how communications had supported and helped their work. The online survey conducted after this event revealed participants´ interest in learning more from peers. Thus, several organisations like Grupo FARO from Ecuador, Fusades from El Salvador and CADEP from Paraguay presented in the second webinar particular policies and mechanisms that they develop to strengthen their communications strategy.

There is large room to increase this capacity building mechanism where colleagues can listen to each other, make questions about concrete tools and channels, and be inspired by those who are similar to them in terms of available resources, expertise, etc. However, to make the most of this opportunity organizers need to work closely beforehand with those who will present their experiences to ensure alignment, consistency and relevance to what is being discussed. Also, think tanks do seldom have time to systematize what they do in terms of communication so this type of events can become a handy resource to start co-building new and relevant knowledge in the field.

Think tanks need to define what they mean by “communications strategy”

A second relevant lesson is that even if strategic communications is a key concern for communications units, executive directors and researchers, there still exists many different ways in which people in each think tank conceptualize what a communications strategy is. This was revealed in the type of questions participants made and also in the concrete experiences they shared.

Therefore, when dealing with such a general and overarching topic, it is advisable to first build some common ground in terms of what is a strategy, what it looks like for diverse think tanks depending on their evolutionary stage and organisational model. For example, a centralised think tank with a strong communications unit that is in charge of most of the channels and tools will probably deal with the design of the strategy in a very different way from a small and decentralized institution where all the researchers are evenly in charge of managing communications. This might also mean that webinars should include mechanisms to work differently with these diverse realities.

Considering the technology

Last but not least, regarding technology we came to similar conclusions to those shared by David Olson in his post about webinars as an e-learning tool for think tanks in Africa: our connectivity is not good enough yet as to avoid technical glitches such as having a presenter who cannot be heard or participants missing parts of the presentation. This is a factor that should not be underestimated: having second editions and taping the webinars are effective ways to partially overcome these hurdles. Trying to deal with these issues by emphasizing human presence and warmth is also important to show appreciation for participants´ time and needs

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

This post has been produced as part of the Think Tank Initiative’s Policy Engagement and Communications (PEC) programme. However,  these are the author’s personal opinions and do not necessarily reflect those of TTI. You can find all ongoing outputs related to this project via the PEC mini-site on Research to Action. To get updates from the PEC programme and be part of the discussion sign-up to our RSS or email updates. You can also follow our progress via Twitter using the following hashtag #ttipec

 

Photo courtesy of Argonne National Laboratory

 

Related posts

EBPDN: Refreshing recommended resources - 31/10/2019
Building momentum to advance citizen evidence in policymaking - 03/09/2019
Bringing researchers and knowledge brokers together for greater impact - 29/05/2019

Get 'New Post' e-alerts and follow R2A

> > > > >

Contribute to R2A:
We welcome blogposts, news about jobs, events or funding, and recommendations for great resources about development communications and research uptake.

Topics: #ttipec, cadep, cippec, communications strategy, gdnet, grupo faro, IDRC, ids, latin america, public engagement, think tank initiative, tti, vansea weyrauch, webinar

Vanesa Weyrauch

Vanesa Weyrauch is a Southern expert in the link between policy and research, think tanks, networks, and policy influence planning, monitoring and evaluation. She has done extensive consulting work to help policy research institutions and work better understand how they can better influence policy through research, including development of innovative M&E methodologies, several online training courses and workshops, and production of new knowledge in her field, with an emphasis in developing countries. She has worked with international, regional and local organizations, especially in Latin America but has also forged collaborative projects in Asia and Africa. Currently she is the co-founder of Politcs& Ideas , a new think net focused on the study of the relationship between politics and ideas and Associate Researcher at CIPPEC , a leading think tank based in Argentina.

Subscribe E-alerts and RSS feeds

Contribute Write a blog post, post a job or event, recommend a resource

Partner with Us Are you an institution looking to increase your impact?

Tweets by @Research2Action

Most Recent Posts

  • Open access guidance, databases and more!
  • Communications Officer x2: London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London – Deadline 25 May
  • ‘The Pitch’, Season 2 – Funding innovations in KM in family planning
  • Using conferences to keep the conversation going
  • What we learned facilitating multi-lingual webinars

This Week's Most Read

  • Policymaker, policy maker, or policy-maker?
  • How to write actionable policy recommendations
  • What do we mean by ‘impact’?
  • Outcome Mapping: A Basic Introduction
  • Gap analysis for literature reviews and advancing useful knowledge
  • Three ways that knowledge brokers can strengthen the impact of scientific research
  • Top tips: Writing newspaper opinion pieces
  • Why study the research environment?
  • Stakeholder Analysis: A basic introduction
  • Synthetic literature reviews: An introduction

About Us

Research to Action (R2A) is a website catering for the strategic and practical needs of people trying to improve the uptake of development research, in particular those funded by DFID.

We have structured the site and populated it with material that we think will be immediately useful to this audience, but also to development researchers in general who would like to be more strategic and effective in their communications.

R2A is produced by a small editorial team, led by CommsConsult. We welcome suggestions for and contributions to the site.

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Cookies
  • Contribute

Our contributors

  • Paula Fray
  • Shubha Jayaram
  • Sue Martin
  • Maria Balarin
  • James Harvey
  • Emily Hayter
  • Susan Koshy
  • Ronald Munatsi
  • Ajoy Datta

Browse all authors

Friends and partners

  • AuthorAid
  • Global Development Network (GDN)
  • INASP
  • Institute of Development Studies (IDS)
  • International Initiative for Impact Evaluation (3ie)
  • ODI RAPID
  • On Think Tanks
  • Politics & Ideas
  • Research for Development (R4D)
  • Research Impact

Copyright © 2022 Research to Action. All rights reserved. Log in