Research to Action

The Global Guide to Research Impact

Navigation

  • Home

  • How To ▾

    This list of how to’s provides an essential guide for a number of key communication and engagement activities that will help make your research travel.

    • Building Capacity
    • Policy Briefs
    • Research Impact
    • Theory of Change
    • Uptake Strategy
  • Topics ▾

    • AEN Evidence 23
    • Eye on 2022
    • Impact Practitioners
    • Knowing your audience ▸
      • Building a strategy
      • Engaging policy audiences ▸
        • EBPDN
        • Targeting policy actors
        • Targeting practitioners
      • Stakeholder mapping
      • Strategic communication ▸
        • Building a brand
        • Engaging the public
      • Working with the media
    • Making your research accessible ▸
      • Framing challenges
      • Knowledge translation
      • Learning in context
      • Open access
      • Presenting your research
      • Using digital tools ▸
        • Using multi media
        • Using online tools/ICTs
        • Using social media
      • Using intermediaries
    • Monitoring and evaluation ▸
      • Applying M&E methods
      • Evidence into policy
      • Measuring success
    • Uncategorized
  • Dialogue Spaces ▾

    • Youth Inclusion and Engagement Space
    • AEN Evidence
    • GDN: Doing Research
    • Manchester Policy Week 2015
    • TTI Exchange 2015
    • Strengthening Institutions to Improve Public Expenditure Accountability (GDN PEM Project)
    • DFID/AusAid Research Communication and Uptake Workshop
    • 3ie Policy Influence and Monitoring (PIM) project
    • Policy Engagement and Communications (PEC) Programme
  • Reading Lists

  • Impact Practitioners

    • Impact Practitioners overview
    • Capacity Building
    • Communication and Engagement
    • Frameworks
    • Indicators
    • Learning
    • Monitoring and Evaluation
    • Policy Impact
    • Strategy
    • Theoretical
    • Utilisation

Social Media

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Vimeo

Featured

Into the lens –video shines light on the many community perspectives of environmental justice

By Soledad Muniz 19/06/2015

How to support community-led research into local justice norms and perceptions of environmental change? What could be the added value of using Participatory Video? These were the crucial questions discussed in 2013 between InsightShare and the research team in the International Development Department of the University of East Anglia.

Participatory Video (PV) would need to support the exploration of the plurality of justice and local conceptions of justice -distributional, procedural and recognition- and help answer the research question: what justice principles are deployed within local communities? PV would be incorporated as a grounded approach to identify principles of justice as part of the inductive instruments used in an ethnographic study.

The ESRC-funded ‘Conservation, Markets and Justice’ research programme includes three case studies: Bolivia, China and Tanzania. In each case, two communities are studied to analyse variation within and between communities on their conceptions of justice in distribution, procedure and recognition.

After the training in PV, together with ongoing professional support that InsightShare provided, the researchers have successfully incorporated PV into their research. All the international and national researchers involved in each case study took part in a three-stage programme:

  1. Stage One: A six-day introduction to PV facilitation and design phase in the UK
  2. Stage Two: A thirteen-day research pilot in Tanzania to test and create the PV for research protocol based on experience
  3. Stage Three: Online mentoring support pre, during and post PV fieldwork

The model provided the right balance for researchers to acquire PV skills in a controlled environment; and through gaining crucial practice in the field in order to learn from experience and adjust the plans based on the pilot in Tanzania.

InsightShare has supported the use of PV in research for the past 15 years. Its projects have included using PV to set up a research agenda that is community-driven for an extensive EU funded programme across three countries in the Himalayan region; to train community representatives to incorporate PV in their community-led research in Mexico & Borneo; and facilitation of PV as part of research on desertification in Central Asia. In this case, InsightShare provided training and capacity building to researchers to facilitate, pilot and embed PV in their research strategy and mentor them along their journey. To achieve this, the three stages were designed.

Stage One aimed to create a safe space for researchers from Bolivia, Venezuela, Tanzania and the UK to come together in Norwich in June 2014, as part of their research preparations. They gained skills in PV facilitation and they started designing the learning question that PV was hoping to answer, as well as determine the fieldwork flow and participatory methods to be used alongside PV.

In Stage Two, we all travelled to Tanzania for two weeks to pilot the research methodology. PV was tested during the first week, which included fieldwork in Kisangi Kimbalambala, Kilwa District, followed by a review process and consolidation of PV protocol, and researchers analysed the added value of PV as part of the ethnographic study.

The videos developed by Kisangi villagers provided rich information about their perceptions of justice and the plurality of those local perceptions depending on the villagers’ status and power in the community structure. Nicole Gross-Camp, one of the Senior Researchers in UEA affirmed “the information that came out of the Participatory Video fieldwork has tremendous value for the ethnographic component in our research project”.

An example of the kind of information found was the different perceptions of each group: the one formed by village leaders and committee members considered unjust the lack of participation in decision-making related to projects brought by NGOs and the government, while the other group was made up of villagers who identified that the access to the open forest was not benefiting the community. Both groups felt that the participatory forest management plan was benefiting them all, providing a much-needed income for the community.

We organised a screening where participants, villagers and the research team came together, as well as the District Forest Officer representing the District authorities. It was an opportunity to share perspectives and celebrate the community participants’ hard work, as well as discuss broader dissemination. The participants wanted to share their films with the world! They asked Mpingo to share it with government officials as well as other stakeholders in Tanzania.

After Stage Two, the researchers were ready to take the learning into their country plans and role out PV in their fieldwork. Iokiñe Rodriguez, another Senior researcher at UEA, remarked on this: “I haven’t learnt so much in a formal training process in years. Your style and approach created the environment for real learning. I feel ready to facilitate Participatory Video in our research project.”

From July 2014 onwards the country preparations and fieldwork began. And so Stage Three unfolded providing pre, during and post fieldwork online mentoring. Fieldwork plans, facilitation challenges and dissemination plans were discussed, reviewed and carried out.

If you want to learn more about the results in each country and the future plans of each research team, please check out the full blog post here.

Related posts

What role for research when ordinary life is put on hold? - 29/11/2024
Africa’s use of evidence: challenges and opportunities - 02/09/2024
Nothing about us without us - 23/08/2024

Get 'New Post' e-alerts and follow R2A

> > > > >

Contribute to R2A:
We welcome blogposts, news about jobs, events or funding, and recommendations for great resources about development communications and research uptake.

Topics: insightshare, participative communciation, participatory video, PV

Soledad Muniz

Soledad specialises in participatory communication with particular skill and experience in deploying participatory video as a tool to monitor and evaluate international development programs. She has over 7 years’ experience researching, planning and implementing numerous participatory video projects, with a strong understanding of the application and potential of the tool in a range of contexts. Soledad has worked in projects in Europe, Latin America, Africa and Asia. She has an MSc in Communication for Innovation and Development from the University of Reading.

Contribute Write a blog post, post a job or event, recommend a resource

Partner with Us Are you an institution looking to increase your impact?

Most Recent Posts

  • What international crisis coverage reveals about the aid system
  • The Future of Evidence: UNICEF’s Blueprint for Smarter Research
  • Why research users are central to research impact
  • Whose knowledge counts in development research?
  • How can research support volunteering?
Looking back at the #R2AArchive this week...

We have landed upon this 2013 piece by Jorge Benavides on what it really takes to turn research into policy.

Based on his work in Guatemala, Benavides shares 5 key lessons for influencing change:
👉 Politics matters – research alone won’t cut it.
👉 Timing is everything – wait for the right window.
👉 Choose allies wisely – coalitions amplify your impact.
👉 Play the long game – real change takes time.
👉 Frame it smartly – make it a win–win.

His takeaway? Evidence is essential—but without artful engagement, it won’t move the needle.

🔗 Read more: https://ow.ly/tfxp50WAE1s (or via #R2AArchive link on Linktree) 🔗

#PolicyChange #ResearchToAction #EvidenceMatters #PolicyInfluence

Looking back at the #R2AArchive this week...

We have landed upon this 2013 piece by Jorge Benavides on what it really takes to turn research into policy.

Based on his work in Guatemala, Benavides shares 5 key lessons for influencing change:
👉 Politics matters – research alone won’t cut it.
👉 Timing is everything – wait for the right window.
👉 Choose allies wisely – coalitions amplify your impact.
👉 Play the long game – real change takes time.
👉 Frame it smartly – make it a win–win.

His takeaway? Evidence is essential—but without artful engagement, it won’t move the needle.

🔗 Read more: https://ow.ly/tfxp50WAE1s (or via #R2AArchive link on Linktree) 🔗

#PolicyChange #ResearchToAction #EvidenceMatters #PolicyInfluence

🗞️ How we tell stories matters.
Our latest blog reflects on Patrick Gathara’s critique of humanitarian storytelling—and how media narratives can uphold the very power structures aid aims to dismantle.

🔍 Big questions:
🧩 Should journalists rethink the stories they tell about crisis?
🧩 Can media and humanitarians work together ethically?

A thoughtful read for anyone passionate about:
🌍 Decolonising aid
📰 Ethical journalism
📣 Amplifying local voices

🔗 Link in bio to read the full blog!
#DecoloniseAid #MediaEthics #HumanitarianNarratives #TheNewHumanitarian #StorytellingMatters #ResearchToAction

🗞️ How we tell stories matters.
Our latest blog reflects on Patrick Gathara’s critique of humanitarian storytelling—and how media narratives can uphold the very power structures aid aims to dismantle.

🔍 Big questions:
🧩 Should journalists rethink the stories they tell about crisis?
🧩 Can media and humanitarians work together ethically?

A thoughtful read for anyone passionate about:
🌍 Decolonising aid
📰 Ethical journalism
📣 Amplifying local voices

🔗 Link in bio to read the full blog!
#DecoloniseAid #MediaEthics #HumanitarianNarratives #TheNewHumanitarian #StorytellingMatters #ResearchToAction

🧠✨ How do we turn research into real change for children?

@unicefinnocenti has been leading the way with their Methodological Briefs—practical guides for making evidence count.

This week #R2ARecommends Brief 6 which looks at evidence synthesis—a smart way to bring together insights from multiple studies to shape better policies and programs.

Check it out via the link in our bio 🔗 

#EvidenceSynthesis #ResearchForImpact #ChildRights #KnowledgeTranslation #UNICEF #R2ARecommends

🧠✨ How do we turn research into real change for children?

@unicefinnocenti has been leading the way with their Methodological Briefs—practical guides for making evidence count.

This week #R2ARecommends Brief 6 which looks at evidence synthesis—a smart way to bring together insights from multiple studies to shape better policies and programs.

Check it out via the link in our bio 🔗

#EvidenceSynthesis #ResearchForImpact #ChildRights #KnowledgeTranslation #UNICEF #R2ARecommends


About Us

Research To Action (R2A) is a learning platform for anyone interested in maximising the impact of research and capturing evidence of impact.

The site publishes practical resources on a range of topics including research uptake, communications, policy influence and monitoring and evaluation. It captures the experiences of practitioners and researchers working on these topics and facilitates conversations between this global community through a range of social media platforms.

R2A is produced by a small editorial team, led by CommsConsult. We welcome suggestions for and contributions to the site.

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Cookies
  • Contribute

Subscribe to our newsletter!

Our contributors

  • Paula Fray
  • Shubha Jayaram
  • Sue Martin
  • Maria Balarin
  • James Harvey
  • Emily Hayter
  • Susan Koshy
  • Ronald Munatsi
  • Ajoy Datta

Browse all authors

Friends and partners

  • AuthorAid
  • Global Development Network (GDN)
  • INASP
  • Institute of Development Studies (IDS)
  • International Initiative for Impact Evaluation (3ie)
  • ODI RAPID
  • On Think Tanks
  • Politics & Ideas
  • Research for Development (R4D)
  • Research Impact

Copyright © 2025 Research to Action. All rights reserved. Log in