Research to Action

The Global Guide to Research Impact

Navigation

  • Home

  • How To ▾

    This list of how to’s provides an essential guide for a number of key communication and engagement activities that will help make your research travel.

    • Building Capacity
    • Policy Briefs
    • Research Impact
    • Theory of Change
    • Uptake Strategy
  • Topics ▾

    • Eye on 2022
    • Knowing your audience ▸
      • Building a strategy
      • Engaging policy audiences ▸
        • EBPDN
        • Targeting policy actors
        • Targeting practitioners
      • Stakeholder mapping
      • Strategic communication ▸
        • Building a brand
        • Engaging the public
      • Working with the media
    • Making your research accessible ▸
      • Framing challenges
      • Knowledge translation
      • Learning in context
      • Open access
      • Presenting your research
      • Using digital tools ▸
        • Using multi media
        • Using online tools/ICTs
        • Using social media
      • Using intermediaries
    • Monitoring and evaluation ▸
      • Applying M&E methods
      • Evidence into policy
      • Measuring success
    • Uncategorized
  • Dialogue Spaces ▾

    • GDN: Doing Research
    • Manchester Policy Week 2015
    • TTI Exchange 2015
    • Strengthening Institutions to Improve Public Expenditure Accountability (GDN PEM Project)
    • DFID/AusAid Research Communication and Uptake Workshop
    • 3ie Policy Influence and Monitoring (PIM) project
    • Policy Engagement and Communications (PEC) Programme
  • Reading Lists

  • Opportunities

Social Media

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Vimeo
  • RSS

Featured

Open Access: One small step or one giant leap?

By Research to Action 28/08/2012

By Clare Gorman

The UK’s Department for International Development (DFID) recently announced the welcome news that all publically-funded development research is to become freely available.  As the recent ‘Academic Spring’ debate attests, this is good news for most, not least of all southern researchers who rank accessing research high up a long list of problems they face when trying to engage with the wider development community.

“Charging the developing world to see findings of new scientific research will mean fewer people escape poverty and could cost lives” warned International Development Secretary Andrew Mitchell as he set out the Department’s new open access policy.  “Even the most groundbreaking research is of no use to anyone if it sits on a shelf gathering dust… What’s just as important, though, is ensuring that these findings get into the hands of those in the developing world who stand to gain most from putting them into practical use.”

Although some may disagree, surely any attempts to make research available easily and at little or no cost to researchers in developing world deserve applause (bravo, Eldis)? Yes… but while open access initiatives and policies such as these are hugely significant, it’s important to understand that the ‘apartheid of knowledge and analysis’ (as Duncan Green of Oxfam puts it) doesn’t end with improving access.

As a programme dedicated to promoting and sharing knowledge from and for the Global South, GDNet has long been aware of the barriers that southern researchers experience to having their knowledge influence global debates on development. GDNet recently identified other key challenges: securing research funding, communicating research findings to peers and policy audiences, and the (mis)perceptions of the quality of southern research, and concluded that a change in personal attitudes towards research from developing countries is also necessary.

Leading by example, GDNet has launched Connect South, a campaign to encourage members of the development research and policy communities to adopt a more inclusive approach to southern research. The campaign calls on people and organisations working in development to pledge how they will help southern researchers to communicate their work better and more widely.  The organization has launched its own Charter of Commitment to southern research which they are hoping will inspire other organizations to do the same.

Ensuring that research findings get into the hands of those who stand to gain most from putting them into practice is one thing. Recognising the value southern research offers to global discussions on development is quite another. If development research is to make the impact DFID wants it to, both need an equal chance to succeed.

Related posts

EBPDN: Refreshing recommended resources - 31/10/2019
Building momentum to advance citizen evidence in policymaking - 03/09/2019
Bringing researchers and knowledge brokers together for greater impact - 29/05/2019

Get 'New Post' e-alerts and follow R2A

> > > > >

Contribute to R2A:
We welcome blogposts, news about jobs, events or funding, and recommendations for great resources about development communications and research uptake.

Topics: connect south, open access

Research to Action

Research to Action (R2A) is a website catering for the strategic and practical needs of people trying to improve the uptake of development research.

3 Responses to Open Access: One small step or one giant leap?

  1. Brian Pratt says:
    30/08/2012 at 10:41 am

    I am not convinced by Open access as it is currently understood . The costs of placing journal articles on open access increases the cost of dissemination , makes more profit for the publishers . It also assumes that only northerners write articles, The majority of the articles in the journal I edit ( Development in Practice ) are from developing country authors , who will not be able to pay for ” open access” . Surely it is more important that they can access the journal through reduced subscriptions and other packages, than occasional articles from Uk and other developed country academics ? .

  2. Steve Zyck says:
    30/08/2012 at 11:54 am

    I think there is some confusion regarding the varieties of open-access publishing. Brian Pratt refers to the author-pays model in which an author has to pay a steep fee to ensure that an article is “open”. The presumption is that authors will finance this through large research grants, which few Northern or Southern researchers have. A second model is more of a hybrid, in which Northern authors with big grants pay, thus subsidizing reduced-cost or free open-access publishing for Southern and junior researchers. Then there is the third model, in which the journal is operated online (since printing is the largest cost for more traditional journals) and powered by postgraduate student labour and donations of time and effort by editors. Such a model means that no one “really” pays, though it is in many ways subsidized by university IT departments and payrolls which finance the free labour (or by providing stipends to academics who launch these journals). That is what the Journal of Humanitarian Assistance has long done, and that is what “Stability: International Journal of Security & Development” is doing. As one of the editors of “Stability”, I can tell you that this model is perfectly viable and makes research free to read and author. And we’re doing it while still having a rigorous peer-review process and a top-notch Editorial Board (see http://www.stabilityjournal.org). More journals should follow this model, and we hope that UK-funded researchers will submit their work to us along with academics from developing and conflict-affected countries. Indeed, we’ve already had a number of sumissions from East and West Africa and from Southeast Asia. Let’s not throw out open-access publishing because a few “traditional” publishers have worked to co-opt the idea while protecting their own profits! — Steve Zyck (steve.zyck@stabilityjournal.org).

Subscribe E-alerts and RSS feeds

Contribute Write a blog post, post a job or event, recommend a resource

Partner with Us Are you an institution looking to increase your impact?

Tweets by @Research2Action

Most Recent Posts

  • Jamlab’s favourite African Podcasts
  • Communications and design: (Not such) a secret ingredient for successful EU Research and Innovation Projects
  • Stakeholder consultation facillitators: Nepal, India and Bangladesh, CGIAR – Rolling deadline
  • Open access guidance, databases and more!
  • Communications Officer x2: London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London – Deadline 25 May

This Week's Most Read

  • Policymaker, policy maker, or policy-maker?
  • How to write actionable policy recommendations
  • What do we mean by ‘impact’?
  • Communications and design: (Not such) a secret ingredient for successful EU Research and Innovation Projects
  • Gap analysis for literature reviews and advancing useful knowledge
  • Outcome Mapping: A Basic Introduction
  • Top tips: Writing newspaper opinion pieces
  • Three ways that knowledge brokers can strengthen the impact of scientific research
  • Key questions to ask when putting together a Theory of Change for Research Uptake (Part 1 of 2)
  • How researchers use LinkedIn effectively

About Us

Research to Action (R2A) is a website catering for the strategic and practical needs of people trying to improve the uptake of development research, in particular those funded by DFID.

We have structured the site and populated it with material that we think will be immediately useful to this audience, but also to development researchers in general who would like to be more strategic and effective in their communications.

R2A is produced by a small editorial team, led by CommsConsult. We welcome suggestions for and contributions to the site.

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Cookies
  • Contribute

Our contributors

  • Paula Fray
  • Shubha Jayaram
  • Sue Martin
  • Maria Balarin
  • James Harvey
  • Emily Hayter
  • Susan Koshy
  • Ronald Munatsi
  • Ajoy Datta

Browse all authors

Friends and partners

  • AuthorAid
  • Global Development Network (GDN)
  • INASP
  • Institute of Development Studies (IDS)
  • International Initiative for Impact Evaluation (3ie)
  • ODI RAPID
  • On Think Tanks
  • Politics & Ideas
  • Research for Development (R4D)
  • Research Impact

Copyright © 2022 Research to Action. All rights reserved. Log in