Research to Action

The Global Guide to Research Impact

Navigation

  • Home

  • How To ▾

    This list of how to’s provides an essential guide for a number of key communication and engagement activities that will help make your research travel.

    • Building Capacity
    • Policy Briefs
    • Research Impact
    • Theory of Change
    • Uptake Strategy
  • Topics ▾

    • Eye on 2022
    • Knowing your audience ▸
      • Building a strategy
      • Engaging policy audiences ▸
        • EBPDN
        • Targeting policy actors
        • Targeting practitioners
      • Stakeholder mapping
      • Strategic communication ▸
        • Building a brand
        • Engaging the public
      • Working with the media
    • Making your research accessible ▸
      • Framing challenges
      • Knowledge translation
      • Learning in context
      • Open access
      • Presenting your research
      • Using digital tools ▸
        • Using multi media
        • Using online tools/ICTs
        • Using social media
      • Using intermediaries
    • Monitoring and evaluation ▸
      • Applying M&E methods
      • Evidence into policy
      • Measuring success
    • Uncategorized
  • Dialogue Spaces ▾

    • GDN: Doing Research
    • Manchester Policy Week 2015
    • TTI Exchange 2015
    • Strengthening Institutions to Improve Public Expenditure Accountability (GDN PEM Project)
    • DFID/AusAid Research Communication and Uptake Workshop
    • 3ie Policy Influence and Monitoring (PIM) project
    • Policy Engagement and Communications (PEC) Programme
  • Reading Lists

  • Opportunities

Social Media

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Vimeo
  • RSS

Featured

Is there light at the end of the tunnel? Interviewing an Applied Economist, who aims for impact but cannot define it.

By Laura ffrench-Constant 23/07/2013

When asked whose responsibility it is to communicate their work, the researcher in question usually responds sheepishly that it is the university or institutions’ responsibility. However, in an interview with an eminent Applied Economist working with developing countries, the answer was surprising- “it is my responsibility to communicate my work”.

Other equally positive responses to questions that communications experts tend to dread followed. Working in a field that has clear policy relevance may make the difference. Continual exposure to the sometimes complicated workings of the policy process has allowed the researcher to tailor the outputs of his work and to meet the needs of the relevant policymakers. When asked if he assumed that policymakers read his research papers in the original format, he responded realistically- that policy makers do not have time to read his work.

The solution he engineers is simple: utilising contacts within various governments, the ideal setting is to sit down with policymakers and talk directly to them, thereby, helping increase information retention. Failing this, appropriate policy briefs are written.  Simple and effective guides to writing policy briefs stress taking into consideration both the audience and their time constraints, amongst other things.

Two other heartening findings were that the said researcher kept a blog and that he believed impact was something to strive for when generating research. Again this could be explained by the researcher’s proximity to policy. In his own words “impact is key to economists, because we have the ability to reach policy and affect the lives of millions of people”. The appreciation for communication was further compounded by the acknowledgement that economics is essentially communication oriented, therefore, making communication inherent within the discipline.

When quizzed about the gap between research and policy, the answer was also encouraging- that most academics within the discipline were evolving to produce a mixed model for outputs. Thus, the research paper comprises only a part of a wider portfolio of work, which may include blogs or social media, improving access and engagement with research.

However, creeping complaints typical of researchers discussing communications soon surfaced. A barrier to the mixed model for outputs was identified: the lack of financial incentives, with researchers gaining no reward for blogging or writing policy briefs. The researcher whilst seeing the value of blogs to disseminate his work and as a source of new ideas, lacked the time to blog regularly because research took priority. Blogs and social media were critiqued for being less rigorous in comparison to traditional research methods, a common complaint levelled at grey literature.

Impact whilst being depicted as crucial to the research process could not be defined. The researcher was pessimistic about solving the problem of impact, as “it is such broad concept which can never be truly objective”. Metrics were the preferred measure of impact and interestingly their flaws were well understood. For those interested, the flaws and bias of metrics are well researched in a recent HEFCE report.

The preponderance with metrics can be explained in part by institutional obsession with them (they now make appearances in CV’s and bids for promotion), and also as the researcher noted due to the difficulty of tracking impact continuously through the policy process, with policy change never being fully attributable to a single cause.

The crux of the problem was highlighted by the researcher in conclusion, that researchers are trained solely in research methods and communication skills are simply assumed. Essentially, it is up to the individual researcher how widely they want to disseminate their work. Training in communication may be the key to ensuring that research obtains impact.

Related posts

EBPDN: Refreshing recommended resources - 31/10/2019
Building momentum to advance citizen evidence in policymaking - 03/09/2019
Bringing researchers and knowledge brokers together for greater impact - 29/05/2019

Get 'New Post' e-alerts and follow R2A

> > > > >

Contribute to R2A:
We welcome blogposts, news about jobs, events or funding, and recommendations for great resources about development communications and research uptake.

Topics: altmetrics, engagement, laura ffrench-constant, metrics, public engagement, research, research communication, research impact, research uptake, writing policy briefs

Laura ffrench-Constant

Laura is Social Media and Outreach Coordinator for Research to Action. Laura manages R2A's social media channels, webinar series and any other project partnerships including conferences. She is also a Senior Associate at CommsConsult. Laura has a degree in Politics and Philosophy from the University of Edinburgh, where she grappled with distilling complex ideas without detracting from the content or context of research.

Subscribe E-alerts and RSS feeds

Contribute Write a blog post, post a job or event, recommend a resource

Partner with Us Are you an institution looking to increase your impact?

Tweets by @Research2Action

Most Recent Posts

  • Jamlab’s favourite African Podcasts
  • Communications and design: (Not such) a secret ingredient for successful EU Research and Innovation Projects
  • Stakeholder consultation facillitators: Nepal, India and Bangladesh, CGIAR – Rolling deadline
  • Open access guidance, databases and more!
  • Communications Officer x2: London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London – Deadline 25 May

This Week's Most Read

  • Policymaker, policy maker, or policy-maker?
  • How to write actionable policy recommendations
  • What do we mean by ‘impact’?
  • Communications and design: (Not such) a secret ingredient for successful EU Research and Innovation Projects
  • Gap analysis for literature reviews and advancing useful knowledge
  • Outcome Mapping: A Basic Introduction
  • Top tips: Writing newspaper opinion pieces
  • Three ways that knowledge brokers can strengthen the impact of scientific research
  • Key questions to ask when putting together a Theory of Change for Research Uptake (Part 1 of 2)
  • How researchers use LinkedIn effectively

About Us

Research to Action (R2A) is a website catering for the strategic and practical needs of people trying to improve the uptake of development research, in particular those funded by DFID.

We have structured the site and populated it with material that we think will be immediately useful to this audience, but also to development researchers in general who would like to be more strategic and effective in their communications.

R2A is produced by a small editorial team, led by CommsConsult. We welcome suggestions for and contributions to the site.

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Cookies
  • Contribute

Our contributors

  • Paula Fray
  • Shubha Jayaram
  • Sue Martin
  • Maria Balarin
  • James Harvey
  • Emily Hayter
  • Susan Koshy
  • Ronald Munatsi
  • Ajoy Datta

Browse all authors

Friends and partners

  • AuthorAid
  • Global Development Network (GDN)
  • INASP
  • Institute of Development Studies (IDS)
  • International Initiative for Impact Evaluation (3ie)
  • ODI RAPID
  • On Think Tanks
  • Politics & Ideas
  • Research for Development (R4D)
  • Research Impact

Copyright © 2022 Research to Action. All rights reserved. Log in