Research to Action

The Global Guide to Research Impact

Navigation

  • Home

  • How To ▾

    This list of how to’s provides an essential guide for a number of key communication and engagement activities that will help make your research travel.

    • Building Capacity
    • Policy Briefs
    • Research Impact
    • Theory of Change
    • Uptake Strategy
  • Topics ▾

    • Knowing your audience ▸
      • Building a strategy
      • Engaging policy audiences ▸
        • EBPDN
        • Targeting policy actors
        • Targeting practitioners
      • Stakeholder mapping
      • Strategic communication ▸
        • Building a brand
        • Engaging the public
      • Working with the media
    • Making your research accessible ▸
      • Framing challenges
      • Knowledge translation
      • Learning in context
      • Open access
      • Presenting your research
      • Using digital tools ▸
        • Using multi media
        • Using online tools/ICTs
        • Using social media
      • Using intermediaries
    • Monitoring and evaluation ▸
      • Applying M&E methods
      • Evidence into policy
      • Measuring success
  • Dialogue Spaces ▾

    • GDN: Doing Research
    • Manchester Policy Week 2015
    • TTI Exchange 2015
    • Strengthening Institutions to Improve Public Expenditure Accountability (GDN PEM Project)
    • DFID/AusAid Research Communication and Uptake Workshop
    • 3ie Policy Influence and Monitoring (PIM) project
    • Policy Engagement and Communications (PEC) Programme
  • Reading Lists

  • Opportunities

Social Media

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Vimeo
  • RSS

Featured

Research and the media: fighting the anxiety

By Anton Tsvetov 14/05/2014

Share this post:

Let’s say you have it all done right. There’s your perfect research product – a report, action plan, roadmap, policy advice, you name it. It’s timely, forward-thinking, substantiated and up-to-date. You have no doubt in its quality. The trade experts praise your good work and you even received a letter from a certain government body saying the paper “will be taken into consideration and used in the agency’s planning and activities”.

But that is not enough, is it? You want your research to get the earned attention – the hype that is produced by a new smartphone launch with reporters calling you all day long asking for further comments and elaboration. So you try your best – press releases are sent out, social media channels are used, even a press-conference is held. And the reaction is the press is pretty much a ‘Meh’.

This is when you get the well-known feeling of media denial anxiety. It progresses very much like grief acceptance – the famous DABDA or Kubler-Ross model – and here’s what you are probably telling yourself:

1)      Denial. “They must have lost my email”, “They must be all just so busy with the whole election/Syria/Ukraine thing”

2)      Anger. “They just don’t get it! This research is the breakthrough of the century. Oh, the press is so ignorant these days!”

3)      Bargaining. “Maybe if I reformulate my pitch in a simpler way I can get more attention”, “What if I make my research results look scandalous?”, “I have to get Guy Kawasaki/Noam Chomsky/Jay-Z promote my research”

4)      Depression. “I have to face it: no one cares about proper research”, “We’ll never be able to eradicate poverty with this attitude”

5)      Acceptance. “OK, next time it will be better. Sooner or later they will understand and I can pitch this majestic piece of research to the media again. THEN will I get the coverage I seek”

The trickiest stage here is Bargaining. At this point you get the strong temptation to ‘de-professionalize’ your research results. Be careful: trying to make your point media-friendly may change its original meaning. If the main conclusion seems too long and specific, there is probably an academic reason for that.

I strongly believe that one should not give in to that temptation. Surely, communicators in think tanks and research organizations should do their best to present their research products in a manner that is plain and comprehensible for the general public. But being professional is more important.

In the end, would it be better if your message was misinterpreted or even distorted?

Please share your ways of dealing with media denial anxiety in the comments below or tweet your tips at @antsvetov.

Image Courtesy of Yoel Ben-Avraham


Share this post:

Related posts

EBPDN: Refreshing recommended resources - 31/10/2019
Building momentum to advance citizen evidence in policymaking - 03/09/2019
Bringing researchers and knowledge brokers together for greater impact - 29/05/2019

Get 'New Post' e-alerts and follow R2A

> > > > >
Share this post:

Contribute to R2A:
We welcome blogposts, news about jobs, events or funding, and recommendations for great resources about development communications and research uptake.


Share this post:

Topics: @antsvetov, anton tsvetov, governments, kubler-ross model, media, media relations, russia, russian international affairs council

Anton Tsvetov

Anton Tsvetov

Anton Tsvetov is a Media and Government Relations Manager at the Russian International Affairs Council (RIAC). He holds a BA in Regional Studies and an MA in Foreign Policy and Diplomacy from MGIMO University. RIAC is a non-profit international relations think-tank on a mission to provide policy recommendations for all of the Russian organizations involved in external affairs.

5 Responses to Research and the media: fighting the anxiety

  1. Avatar Megan Lloyd-Laney says:
    15/05/2014 at 2:07 pm

    I love the idea of media denial anxiety – we’ve all been there. As a former journalist, I think there’s real virtue in developing relationships with key journalists in advance of publishing your story – you can use them for informal feedback in advance to make sure you’re making clear what’s newsworthy about your research. Using twitter to attract attention of individual journalists who you know are involved in discussions around your topic also helps. Good luck!

    • Anton Tsvetov Anton Tsvetov says:
      12/06/2014 at 1:09 pm

      Megan, I appreciate the comments very much and thanks for the shoutout on Twitter. I think it’s also important to find journalists that trust proper scholarly research, as some still prefer sensational hype over profound, but “boring” analysis.

  2. Avatar Nyasha Vuta says:
    11/06/2014 at 8:55 am

    I am often told that a journalist is as good as his or her source and I believe it, but what is a story without an audience? After reading this article, I agree that media anxiety is what researchers need to work on to make reporting more clear and relevant. I find the use of social media platforms effective in dealing with feedback, lets use them more. Thank you for this article!

    • Anton Tsvetov Anton Tsvetov says:
      12/06/2014 at 1:06 pm

      Thank you very much for the feedback, Nyasha! Thankfully, these days we have social media that allows us to promote research by ourselves. But it helps to have media attention too!

Subscribe E-alerts and RSS feeds

Contribute Write a blog post, post a job or event, recommend a resource

Partner with Us Are you an institution looking to increase your impact?

Tweets by @Research2Action

Most Recent Posts

  • Research Director, GiveDirectly – Deadline: 14 February, 2021
  • Strategies to integrate research evidence into policy and system decision-making
  • Senior Communications Adviser, Trade and Climate Change: Trade Justice Movement – Deadline 8 February
  • Marketing and Communications Officer, Low Impact Fishers of Europe (LIFE), Brussels (negotiable) – Deadline: 8 February
  • How to rebuild trust in science and expertise

This Week's Most Read

  • What do we mean by ‘impact’?
  • Policymaker, policy maker, or policy-maker?
  • How to write actionable policy recommendations
  • Outcome Mapping: A Basic Introduction
  • Gap analysis for literature reviews and advancing useful knowledge
  • Top tips: Writing newspaper opinion pieces
  • How does policy change happen?
  • How researchers use LinkedIn effectively
  • Should we use “indigenous knowledge”… even if it’s wrong?
  • Stakeholder Analysis: A basic introduction

About Us

Research to Action (R2A) is a website catering for the strategic and practical needs of people trying to improve the uptake of development research, in particular those funded by DFID.

We have structured the site and populated it with material that we think will be immediately useful to this audience, but also to development researchers in general who would like to be more strategic and effective in their communications.

R2A is produced by a small editorial team, led by CommsConsult. We welcome suggestions for and contributions to the site.

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Cookies
  • Contribute

Our contributors

  • Paula FrayPaula Fray
  • Shubha JayaramShubha Jayaram
  • AvatarSue Martin
  • Maria BalarinMaria Balarin
  • James HarveyJames Harvey
  • Emily HayterEmily Hayter
  • Susan KoshySusan Koshy
  • Ronald MunatsiRonald Munatsi
  • Ajoy DattaAjoy Datta

Browse all authors

Friends and partners

  • AuthorAid
  • Global Development Network (GDN)
  • INASP
  • Institute of Development Studies (IDS)
  • International Initiative for Impact Evaluation (3ie)
  • ODI RAPID
  • On Think Tanks
  • Politics & Ideas
  • Research for Development (R4D)
  • Research Impact

Copyright © 2021 Research to Action. All rights reserved. Log in

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Read MoreCookie settingsACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are as essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled

Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.

Non-necessary

Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.

SAVE & ACCEPT