Research to Action

The Global Guide to Research Impact

Navigation

  • Home

  • How To ▾

    This list of how to’s provides an essential guide for a number of key communication and engagement activities that will help make your research travel.

    • Building Capacity
    • Policy Briefs
    • Research Impact
    • Theory of Change
    • Uptake Strategy
  • Topics ▾

    • Eye on 2022
    • Impact Practitioners ▸
      • Impact Practitioners
    • Knowing your audience ▸
      • Building a strategy
      • Engaging policy audiences ▸
        • EBPDN
        • Targeting policy actors
        • Targeting practitioners
      • Stakeholder mapping
      • Strategic communication ▸
        • Building a brand
        • Engaging the public
      • Working with the media
    • Making your research accessible ▸
      • Framing challenges
      • Knowledge translation
      • Learning in context
      • Open access
      • Presenting your research
      • Using digital tools ▸
        • Using multi media
        • Using online tools/ICTs
        • Using social media
      • Using intermediaries
    • Monitoring and evaluation ▸
      • Applying M&E methods
      • Evidence into policy
      • Measuring success
    • Uncategorized
  • Dialogue Spaces ▾

    • GDN: Doing Research
    • Manchester Policy Week 2015
    • TTI Exchange 2015
    • Strengthening Institutions to Improve Public Expenditure Accountability (GDN PEM Project)
    • DFID/AusAid Research Communication and Uptake Workshop
    • 3ie Policy Influence and Monitoring (PIM) project
    • Policy Engagement and Communications (PEC) Programme
  • Reading Lists

  • Impact Practitioners

    • Impact Practitioners overview
    • Capacity Building
    • Communication and Engagement
    • Frameworks
    • Learning
    • Monitoring and Evaluation
    • Policy Impact
    • Strategy
    • Theoretical
    • Utilisation

Social Media

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Vimeo

Featured

Policymaker, policy maker, or policy-maker?

By Kimberly Clarke 12/10/2009

Word processors have changed dramatically the way we all work. There is still a lot for editors to do, but today it is easier for authors to get their text right. And with so much more being published and budgets constrained, the fact of life is that most material is never edited, so the more authors can get right, the better the final product will be.

The aim of editing is to ensure that the reader is able to understand just what the author is trying to convey. Even if the substance is there, if the language is ambiguous, or the text tiring or distracting to read, the author can quickly lose some of the audience that they had gained. If you can’t afford an editor you can help your project’s future readers enormously by developing a ‘house style’ for all your written outputs.

Some house style manuals are very detailed, and in addition to standardising spelling they cover the way one ought to use words and phrases, as well as guide design such as styles of headings and text fonts. But even if you cover only the ten points below, you will make your written materials much more consistent, and create fewer distractions for your readers. Below them are some links to the house style guides of some very well-known publications – they are interesting reads in themselves, but you can always choose one of them and ask your authors to follow that style, and then add any extra rules specific to your project. I have also included a link to a good online guide to English usage, and to the Plain English Campaign’s ‘A-Z of Alternative Words’, which might persuade your authors to use more of our short clear Saxon-origin words instead of their longer Latin-inspired cousins.

Ten key house style points

1. Decide on basic British vs American spellings , plus s or z if you go for British, then add any exceptions for your own version of English, which varies across the world. A list of the most obvious spelling choices is helpful, but you can also choose and specify a particular dictionary.

2. Every field has its own jargon and specialist terms, including acronyms. Make a list of these with agreed spellings for authors (and definitely for editors).

3. Decide whether to use single or double quotes, a comma after the second-last item in a list or not (e.g. She carried a bag, ball, and stick.), % or per cent or percent, USD or US$, Dr or Dr. and eg or e.g. for abbreviations, metric or imperial measurements, and clarify any other text where there is more than one correct spelling.

4. Many projects work in well-defined countries or geographical areas. Make a list of the key place names, people, organisations, currencies, local context terms (e.g. parliament or assembly), and non-English words that will be regularly used in project outputs.

5. Agree which typeface or font your projects will use for which outputs, and which heading styles (size, font, and use of capital letters). This will prevent enthusiastic but inexperienced authors from peppering their papers with far too many variations. This includes indenting paragraphs (in general and after headings), and the style for table headings and labels, and figure and photograph captions.

6. Agree how citations and references should appear, so that readers can search for information easily and time and money is not wasted having to standardise them after the document is ready for publication.

7. Make sure anyone who is producing outputs in your project has the correct logo, has a high-resolution version for printing and a low-resolution version for electronic uses, and knows the difference.

8. Unnecessary spaces in your document will make word processing software behave unpredictably when it comes to layout. Remove any extra spaces at the end of headings and paragraphs, in tables, and only leave one space after a full stop at the end of a sentence. (Double and even triple spaces were necessary when documents were typewritten. It gave the writer some extra space to play with when they had to go back and paint out and correct mistakes.)

9. Make sure any document that is likely to be printed out contains all your contact details as well as citation details for the document itself on an inside page (not just on the cover, which is often removed on pdfs), including the web address if it’s available online. Hotlinks are convenient in electronic papers, but the key information is hidden once the document is printed out.

10. Use capital letters, bold, and italics sparingly.

Some useful links:

BBC News Style Guide

Guardian Style Guide

The Economist Style Guide

Chicago Manual of Style

Common Errors in English Usage by Paul Brians

Plain English Campaign’s ‘The A–Z of Alternative Words’

Related posts

EBPDN: Refreshing recommended resources - 31/10/2019
Building momentum to advance citizen evidence in policymaking - 03/09/2019
Bringing researchers and knowledge brokers together for greater impact - 29/05/2019

Get 'New Post' e-alerts and follow R2A

> > > > >

Contribute to R2A:
We welcome blogposts, news about jobs, events or funding, and recommendations for great resources about development communications and research uptake.

Topics: editing, house style, Participative communication, practical guide, publishing, r4d, research, text

Kimberly Clarke

Kimberly is a freelance writer and editor, and Editor of Research to Action. Kimberly has a strong international background in writing and editing, and in evaluation and tracking the impact of communication. She has worked with many international organizations, development agencies and media including the International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED), UK Department For International Development (DFID), Practical Action, IPS, Overseas Development Institute (ODI), the Commonwealth Secretariat, the Water, Engineering and Development Centre (WEDC), Institute of Development Studies (IDS), International Forum for Rural Transport and Development (IFRTD), Plan International, UNDP, FAO, TVE and OnePlanet Pictures.

Contribute Write a blog post, post a job or event, recommend a resource

Partner with Us Are you an institution looking to increase your impact?

Tweets by @Research2Action

Most Recent Posts

  • Communications Officer, United Nations Environment Programme: Paris – Deadline 16 March
  • Putting research users into the centre of uptake strategy: lessons from the EEG programme
  • Creating Presentations with ease
  • European Union Prize for Citizen Science
  • How to standardise quantitative indicators of impact 

This Week's Most Read

  • 12ft Ladder: Making research accessible
  • How to write actionable policy recommendations
  • What do we mean by ‘impact’?
  • Outcome Mapping: A Basic Introduction
  • Gap analysis for literature reviews and advancing useful knowledge
  • Policymaker, policy maker, or policy-maker?
  • Key questions to ask when putting together a Theory of Change for Research Uptake (Part 1 of 2)
  • Is the age of the Policy Brief over?
  • Putting research users into the centre of uptake strategy: lessons from the EEG programme
  • Top tips: Writing newspaper opinion pieces

About Us

Research To Action (R2A) is a learning platform for anyone interested in maximising the impact of research and capturing evidence of impact.

The site publishes practical resources on a range of topics including research uptake, communications, policy influence and monitoring and evaluation. It captures the experiences of practitioners and researchers working on these topics and facilitates conversations between this global community through a range of social media platforms.

R2A is produced by a small editorial team, led by CommsConsult. We welcome suggestions for and contributions to the site.

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Cookies
  • Contribute

Subscribe to our newsletter!

Our contributors

  • Paula Fray
  • Shubha Jayaram
  • Sue Martin
  • Maria Balarin
  • James Harvey
  • Emily Hayter
  • Susan Koshy
  • Ronald Munatsi
  • Ajoy Datta

Browse all authors

Friends and partners

  • AuthorAid
  • Global Development Network (GDN)
  • INASP
  • Institute of Development Studies (IDS)
  • International Initiative for Impact Evaluation (3ie)
  • ODI RAPID
  • On Think Tanks
  • Politics & Ideas
  • Research for Development (R4D)
  • Research Impact

Copyright © 2023 Research to Action. All rights reserved. Log in