Research to Action

The Global Guide to Research Impact

Navigation

  • Home

  • How To ▾

    This list of how to’s provides an essential guide for a number of key communication and engagement activities that will help make your research travel.

    • Building Capacity
    • Policy Briefs
    • Research Impact
    • Theory of Change
    • Uptake Strategy
  • Topics ▾

    • Eye on 2022
    • Impact Practitioners ▸
      • Impact Practitioners
    • Knowing your audience ▸
      • Building a strategy
      • Engaging policy audiences ▸
        • EBPDN
        • Targeting policy actors
        • Targeting practitioners
      • Stakeholder mapping
      • Strategic communication ▸
        • Building a brand
        • Engaging the public
      • Working with the media
    • Making your research accessible ▸
      • Framing challenges
      • Knowledge translation
      • Learning in context
      • Open access
      • Presenting your research
      • Using digital tools ▸
        • Using multi media
        • Using online tools/ICTs
        • Using social media
      • Using intermediaries
    • Monitoring and evaluation ▸
      • Applying M&E methods
      • Evidence into policy
      • Measuring success
    • Uncategorized
  • Dialogue Spaces ▾

    • GDN: Doing Research
    • Manchester Policy Week 2015
    • TTI Exchange 2015
    • Strengthening Institutions to Improve Public Expenditure Accountability (GDN PEM Project)
    • DFID/AusAid Research Communication and Uptake Workshop
    • 3ie Policy Influence and Monitoring (PIM) project
    • Policy Engagement and Communications (PEC) Programme
  • Reading Lists

  • Impact Practitioners

    • Impact Practitioners overview
    • Capacity Building
    • Communication and Engagement
    • Frameworks
    • Indicators
    • Learning
    • Monitoring and Evaluation
    • Policy Impact
    • Strategy
    • Theoretical
    • Utilisation

Social Media

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Vimeo

Featured

Open Access – What can DFID do?

By Abdourahmane Idrissa 16/11/2009

There was a great deal of interest in the recent ‘Open Access Week’. DFID-funded researchers are asking themselves both what is expected of them and what they could do.

Towards a DFID Research Policy on Open Access, a report by Peter Ballantyne for DFID, scoped how DFID Research could take forward an open access policy that will lead to greater public access to the research outputs it finances. It is not a policy for DFID; it provides some building blocks for such a policy.

The report provides a snapshot of the current situation across a wide range of projects. It is based on a series of face-to-face and electronic exchanges with people involved in research access and communication. It also draws on the large online literature and debate – but can hardly do justice to all the richness encountered.

Ballantyne highlights some open-access views and concerns among DFID research partners, points to a few cases and examples, and summarises ways DFID Research could make a difference:

1. Take a broad ‘open knowledge’ perspective. It is about more than journal articles.

2. In general:

  • Require systematic deposit of outputs and metadata in open-archiving systems and repositories, including in a ‘UKPubDev Central’.
  • Require appropriate acknowledgement of DFID funding.
  • Encourage use of ‘open licenses’ that recognise authorship and enable re-use.
  • Encourage use of open formats and standards.
  • Encourage the development of open platforms and initiatives.

3. For different categories of outputs:

  • Encourage publication in open-access journals (or hybrid journals).
  • Provide funds for any open-access charges.
  • Encourage authors and publishers to license articles for re-use, with attribution.
  • Establish a complete ‘UKPubDev Central’ repository of DFID-supported outputs.
  • Capture metadata centrally.
  • Deposit outputs in proper institutional or subject repositories.
  • Require that outputs and metadata acknowledge DFID sponsorship.
  • Require that significant web content is permanently archived and accessible.
  • Encourage the use of social media to report and communicate research.
  • Require that projects develop a data curation and accessibility plan.
  • In health and medicine, DFID to join the UK PubMed Central (UKPMC), adopting its policies on deposit and licenses already established.

4. In addition:

  • Adapt DFID research contracts to mandate these provisions.
  • Require each funding proposal to present an ‘accessibility plan’ or framework.
  • Include funds for open access in proposed budgets.
  • Include accessibility in regular reports of projects.
  • Encourage content contribution to any specialised repositories or services.
  • Support preferential access initiatives for developing countries.
  • Support open-access journal publishing initiatives in developing countries.
  • Contribute to awareness-raising efforts that explain open access and how it helps DFID and its partners achieve their scientific and developmental goals.
  • Engage other research funders.
  • Create an ‘open access to R4D’ fund to support and recognise initiatives.

An outstanding question is if and how such a policy should be applied retrospectively. It is important that current workflows and behaviours are quickly changed to ensure that all future outputs are captured and can be accessed for posterity. But actions are also needed across the community to ensure that what has already been created will remain accessible.

Related posts

EBPDN: Refreshing recommended resources - 31/10/2019
Building momentum to advance citizen evidence in policymaking - 03/09/2019
Bringing researchers and knowledge brokers together for greater impact - 29/05/2019

Get 'New Post' e-alerts and follow R2A

> > > > >

Contribute to R2A:
We welcome blogposts, news about jobs, events or funding, and recommendations for great resources about development communications and research uptake.

Topics: dfid, electronic exchanges, journals, open access, open knowledge, Participative communication, policy, policy making, public engagement, publishing, r4d, research, research outputs, text

Abdourahmane Idrissa

Abdourahmane Idrissa is a political scientist based in Niamey, Niger, where he founded the Think Tank EPGA in 2015. The focus of the Think Tank is to influence policy-making in issues related to youth employment, migration and population through empirical and theoretical research in Niger and West Africa. He has recently published a Historical Dictionary of Niger and L’Afrique pour les nuls (‘Africa for Dummies’).

2 Responses to Open Access – What can DFID do?

  1. Andrew says:
    17/11/2009 at 10:01 am

    The open access debate seems to go on and on. This DFID funded study seems to highlight again the need for better access to journal articles. From the perspective of using R4D, it can be very frustrating when research is linked back to a journal that you cannot get access to without going through the process of setting up an account with the journal and making a payment.

    Open access must be the way forward with people increasingly demanding knowledge and information that is highly accessible and diverse. We need to get research into use and create a dialogue around it. For all those cynics out there check out the following site as a potential source of inspiration: http://www.opendoar.org/index.html

Contribute Write a blog post, post a job or event, recommend a resource

Partner with Us Are you an institution looking to increase your impact?

Tweets by @Research2Action

Most Recent Posts

  • Visual storytelling: The Pudding
  • Study In Germany: 2023 Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung (FES) Scholarship Programme for Developing Countries
  •  How to develop input, activity, output, outcome and impact indicators 
  • Free webinar: Beyond content delivery: How to make online learning truly participatory
  • UNV Social and Behaviour Change (SBC) Officer, UNICEF: Ethiopia – Deadline 29 March

This Week's Most Read

  • How to write actionable policy recommendations
  • Policymaker, policy maker, or policy-maker?
  • What do we mean by ‘impact’?
  • Outcome Mapping: A Basic Introduction
  • Gap analysis for literature reviews and advancing useful knowledge
  • Top tips: Writing newspaper opinion pieces
  • 12ft Ladder: Making research accessible
  •  How to develop input, activity, output, outcome and impact indicators 
  • Stakeholder Analysis: A basic introduction
  • Stakeholder Engagement a Tool to Measure Public Policy

About Us

Research To Action (R2A) is a learning platform for anyone interested in maximising the impact of research and capturing evidence of impact.

The site publishes practical resources on a range of topics including research uptake, communications, policy influence and monitoring and evaluation. It captures the experiences of practitioners and researchers working on these topics and facilitates conversations between this global community through a range of social media platforms.

R2A is produced by a small editorial team, led by CommsConsult. We welcome suggestions for and contributions to the site.

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Cookies
  • Contribute

Subscribe to our newsletter!

Our contributors

  • Paula Fray
  • Shubha Jayaram
  • Sue Martin
  • Maria Balarin
  • James Harvey
  • Emily Hayter
  • Susan Koshy
  • Ronald Munatsi
  • Ajoy Datta

Browse all authors

Friends and partners

  • AuthorAid
  • Global Development Network (GDN)
  • INASP
  • Institute of Development Studies (IDS)
  • International Initiative for Impact Evaluation (3ie)
  • ODI RAPID
  • On Think Tanks
  • Politics & Ideas
  • Research for Development (R4D)
  • Research Impact

Copyright © 2023 Research to Action. All rights reserved. Log in