Research to Action

The Global Guide to Research Impact

Navigation

  • Home

  • How To ▾

    This list of how to’s provides an essential guide for a number of key communication and engagement activities that will help make your research travel.

    • Building Capacity
    • Policy Briefs
    • Research Impact
    • Theory of Change
    • Uptake Strategy
  • Topics ▾

    • Knowing your audience ▸
      • Building a strategy
      • Engaging policy audiences ▸
        • EBPDN
        • Targeting policy actors
        • Targeting practitioners
      • Stakeholder mapping
      • Strategic communication ▸
        • Building a brand
        • Engaging the public
      • Working with the media
    • Making your research accessible ▸
      • Framing challenges
      • Knowledge translation
      • Learning in context
      • Open access
      • Presenting your research
      • Using digital tools ▸
        • Using multi media
        • Using online tools/ICTs
        • Using social media
      • Using intermediaries
    • Monitoring and evaluation ▸
      • Applying M&E methods
      • Evidence into policy
      • Measuring success
  • Dialogue Spaces ▾

    • GDN: Doing Research
    • Manchester Policy Week 2015
    • TTI Exchange 2015
    • Strengthening Institutions to Improve Public Expenditure Accountability (GDN PEM Project)
    • DFID/AusAid Research Communication and Uptake Workshop
    • 3ie Policy Influence and Monitoring (PIM) project
    • Policy Engagement and Communications (PEC) Programme
  • Reading Lists

  • Opportunities

Social Media

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Vimeo
  • RSS

Featured

Introduction to stakeholder engagement

By Institute of Development Studies 05/02/2014

Share this post:

In research, publications and other outputs are often seen as the end product. But for Think Tanks and organisations aiming to affect change in the world, an output is, at best, a means to an end. To give research ‘legs’, Think Tanks often create a package of outputs and activities that engage, and even involve, reach various audiences, or stakeholders throughout the process.

This guide provides an introduction to stakeholder engagement and outlines a number of tools that can be used to better understand who your stakeholders are.

Title: Introduction to Stakeholder Engagement Author: Institute of Development Studies Year: 2013

__________________________________________________________________________________________________

This resource has been produced as part of the Think Tank Initiative’s Policy Engagement and Communications (PEC) programme. You can find all ongoing outputs related to this project via the PEC mini-site on Research to Action. To get updates from the PEC programme and be part of the discussion sign-up to our RSS or email updates. You can also follow our progress via Twitter using the following hashtag #ttipec.

Image courtesy of smarnad/FreeDigitalPhotos.net

 


Share this post:

Related posts

EBPDN: Refreshing recommended resources - 31/10/2019
Building momentum to advance citizen evidence in policymaking - 03/09/2019
Bringing researchers and knowledge brokers together for greater impact - 29/05/2019

Get 'New Post' e-alerts and follow R2A

> > > > >
Share this post:

Contribute to R2A:
We welcome blogposts, news about jobs, events or funding, and recommendations for great resources about development communications and research uptake.


Share this post:

Topics: #ttipec, engagement, IDRC, ids, institute of development studies, pec, stakeholder engagement, stakeholder mapping, think tank initiative, tti

Institute of Development Studies

Institute of Development Studies

The Institute of Development Studies (IDS) is a leading global charity for international development research, teaching and communications. IDS, in partnership with Practical Action Consulting, are leading the South Asia and Latin American elements of the Think Tank Initiative's Policy Engagement and Communications (PEC) programme. IDS will be publishing a range of materials relating to this programme on R2A.

8 Responses to Introduction to stakeholder engagement

  1. Avatar Cheryl Brown says:
    07/02/2014 at 11:50 am

    This is a nice summary of some useful tools, thanks.

    Another stakeholder analysis tool that I like to use is one developed by Peter Block looking at organisation politics and positions stakeholders in term of level of Trust and Agreement with you.
    It was developed to help leaders manage organisational change but I find it really useful for situations where someone is trying to influence other people when the only power they have is that of their relationships. So this could be useful for think tanks who are trying to influence stakeholders with whom they have some level of existing relationships (negative or positive).

    The Block matrix is explained nicely here with some advice on how to work with each group e.g. with Opponents (where there’s trust but disagreement) are people you can have a constructive discussion with because you already have an established relationship and may end up reviewing your viewpoint or reframing it.
    http://www.teamstarproject.org/pdf/Strategic%20Influence.pdf

    I also recommend doing a stakeholder analysis of stakeholders i.e. who has power/influence over your most important stakeholders. You will probably identify some people/groups that they are influenced by or whose interests they have to respond to and you can tailor your communication to respect this.

  2. Avatar Andrew Clappison says:
    12/02/2014 at 3:11 pm

    Hi Cheryl,

    Very interesting comment, thanks.

    Have you ever tried using Net-Map? A whole industry seems to have grown-up around this tool and yet it’s not very clear what this tool offers that’s unique…

    I’ve not come accross the work by Peter Block before and I will be sure to take a look at this – it sounds very useful, especially given the focus on existing relationships. What tool would you reccomend for “a stakeholder analysis of stakeholders”? It sometimes feels like a very difficult task understanding who has influence over your stakeholders, especially if you don’t reside within the same networks as them.

    Andrew

    • Avatar Cheryl Brown says:
      13/02/2014 at 11:52 am

      Hi Andrew,

      I haven’t used Net-Map. I’m more of a flipchart and marker girl to be honest! I’m just rediscovering Peter Block’s work actually. There’s a summary of his “six conversations” methodology for civic engagement here http://www.peterblock.com/_assets/downloads/Civic.pdf and there’s a lot of value I think in looking at conversation as the route for engagement.

      To do a stakeholder analysis of stakeholders…a few ways:
      1) use the same tools but a different starting point. So if I want to understand my most important stakeholders better e.g. those who fall into the High Interest, High Power quadrant, such as a program donor, then I’d do a stakeholder analysis for them – who has Power and Interest over them and what are those interests and powers. For example, if you learn that your donor needs to have a strong relationship with the voting public in that country and that they worry about tax-payers money being wasted, then you can respond to that when you communicate to your donor.

      2) Take a look at some marketing (yikes!) theory e.g. the Organisational Decision Making Unit which would suggest who your stakeholders might be influenced by. I’ve tried to find a development-friendly summary online but am stumped. However I do explain it on p.17 of an IDS publication
      ids.ac.uk/files/dmfile/WhoareweaimingtoreachCBrownJul2010.pdf

      3) Do some research – not necessarily field research. I think you make a good point about it being hard to know who/what influences your stakeholders. So especially for important stakeholders, we have to put the time in to doing some digging. Sounds like the topic for another blog post: “Stalking stakeholders: doing online research to understand your stakeholders’ needs and influencers”

  3. Avatar Cheryl Brown says:
    16/02/2014 at 3:10 pm

    Somehow I deleted my reply when I edited it. Here it is again:

    Hi Andrew,

    I haven’t used Net-Map. I’m more of a flipchart and marker girl to be honest!
    I’m just rediscovering Peter Block’s work actually. There’s a summary of his
    “six conversations” methodology for civic engagement here http://www.peterblock.com/_assets/downloads/Civic.pdf and
    there’s a lot of value I think in looking at conversation as the route for
    engagement.

    To do a stakeholder analysis of stakeholders…a few ways:
    1) use the same tools but a different starting point. So if I want to understand my most
    important stakeholders better e.g. those who fall into the High Interest, High
    Power quadrant, such as a program donor, then I’d do a stakeholder analysis for
    them – who has Power and Interest over them and what are those interests and
    powers. For example, if you learn that your donor needs to have a strong
    relationship with the voting public in that country and that they worry about
    tax-payers money being wasted, then you can respond to that when you communicate
    to your donor.

    2) Take a look at some marketing (yikes!) theory e.g. the Organisational
    Decision Making Unit which would suggest who your stakeholders might be
    influenced by. I’ve tried to find a development-friendly summary online but am
    stumped. However I do explain it on p.17 of an IDS publication
    ids.ac.uk/files/dmfile/WhoareweaimingtoreachCBrownJul2010.pdf

    3) Do some research – not necessarily field research. This should probably be no.1 if we’re looking at this in terms of importance. I think you make a good point about it being hard to know who/what influences your stakeholders. So, especially for important stakeholders, we have to put the time in to doing some digging. Sounds like the topic for another blog post: “Stalking stakeholders:
    doing online research to understand your stakeholders’ needs and
    influencers”, but I have had some experience of doing this.
    I expect you’d agree that it’s pretty essential to research your target audiences (using secondary research if you can’t stretch to asking them yourself) and I’d make the case for expanding this to take in other stakeholders given their potential influence on your programme’s success. Especially as sometimes, they’re in both camps e.g. donor and intended user.
    Depending on who the stakeholder is, you may find someone has done the work for you or they themselves have made their stakeholder analysis available (showing how has power and influence over them).

    4) IIED has a great “power tool” (part of a whole set that are all worth a look) on stakeholder influence mapping – I remember seeing the hand-drawn example one time and thinking it looked like a handy approach to mapping relationships and how they change over time.
    http://www.policy-powertools.org/Tools/Understanding/SIM.html

    • Avatar Andrew Clappison says:
      28/02/2014 at 2:46 pm

      Hi Cheryl,

      There is so much valuble stuff here, much of which I
      did not know existed. Thanks for enlightening me! I have already printed
      some of this stuff out and have added it all to my ‘to read’ list.

      I
      like the idea of “Stalking stakeholders: doing online research to
      understand your stakeholders’ needs and influencers”… let me know if
      you get round to writing this, it would be a valuble contribution to
      R2A if you wanted to find a home for it!

      Andrew

Subscribe E-alerts and RSS feeds

Contribute Write a blog post, post a job or event, recommend a resource

Partner with Us Are you an institution looking to increase your impact?

Tweets by @Research2Action

Most Recent Posts

  • Grants acquisition and fundraising strategies: Some basic rules
  • Head of Africa Engagement: Girls Not Brides, Nairobi – Deadline 31 March
  • Dashboard: Communicating complex data clearly
  • Research Director, GiveDirectly – Deadline: 14 February, 2021
  • Strategies to integrate research evidence into policy and system decision-making

This Week's Most Read

  • What do we mean by ‘impact’?
  • Policymaker, policy maker, or policy-maker?
  • How to write actionable policy recommendations
  • Gap analysis for literature reviews and advancing useful knowledge
  • Outcome Mapping: A Basic Introduction
  • Stakeholder Analysis: A basic introduction
  • Three ways that knowledge brokers can strengthen the impact of scientific research
  • Top tips: Writing newspaper opinion pieces
  • How does policy change happen?
  • Synthetic literature reviews: An introduction

About Us

Research to Action (R2A) is a website catering for the strategic and practical needs of people trying to improve the uptake of development research, in particular those funded by DFID.

We have structured the site and populated it with material that we think will be immediately useful to this audience, but also to development researchers in general who would like to be more strategic and effective in their communications.

R2A is produced by a small editorial team, led by CommsConsult. We welcome suggestions for and contributions to the site.

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Cookies
  • Contribute

Our contributors

  • Paula FrayPaula Fray
  • Shubha JayaramShubha Jayaram
  • AvatarSue Martin
  • Maria BalarinMaria Balarin
  • James HarveyJames Harvey
  • Emily HayterEmily Hayter
  • Susan KoshySusan Koshy
  • Ronald MunatsiRonald Munatsi
  • Ajoy DattaAjoy Datta

Browse all authors

Friends and partners

  • AuthorAid
  • Global Development Network (GDN)
  • INASP
  • Institute of Development Studies (IDS)
  • International Initiative for Impact Evaluation (3ie)
  • ODI RAPID
  • On Think Tanks
  • Politics & Ideas
  • Research for Development (R4D)
  • Research Impact

Copyright © 2021 Research to Action. All rights reserved. Log in

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Read MoreCookie settingsACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are as essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled

Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.

Non-necessary

Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.

SAVE & ACCEPT